dooce® - dooce.com

Why any woman who intends to vote for McCain should reconsider

Two of my favorite bloggers in the past couple of days have explained in succinct detail why we (women in particular) should be sickened by John McCain. I implore you to take the time to read these, they're not just a bunch of liberal propaganda or pro-choice cheerleading. These are stories of people's lives.

From Alexa at Flotsam:

McCain states that he would deal with the issue of abortion with “courage and compassion.” I quote: “the courage of a pregnant mother to bring her child into the world and the compassion of civil society to meet her needs and those of her newborn baby.” As if terminating my pregnancy would be the easy way out, the way not requiring his precious “courage.” As if dictating my medical care based upon his religious beliefs is compassionate. And I find it interesting to note that his “compassion” for this newborn does not extend to guaranteeing it health insurance.

And Julie from a little pregnant:

He means us when he holds up his hands and says with that single scornful gesture that we don't matter. That we are a figment of the "pro-abortion movement's" imagination. That — what, we're making this whole "staying pregnant might kill me" thing up?

... even if you're implacably, unconditionally opposed to abortion, a matter on which reasonable people disagree, I don't see any way a thinking person can look at those air quotes and see anything but pandering, contempt, and a dangerous willful ignorance.

Daily 777 comments
  • 1. Katelin said:

    they definitely bring up great points and i couldn't agree more.

  • 2. Daddy Scratches said:

    And yet, the polls are, for the third election in a row, split rather evenly. Single digit differences do not a mandate make. Frightening.

    Can't we just split of into the United Blue Staters of America?

  • 3. Angelbee said:

    I can hardly believe that I live in a country where there are still (!) people who think it's okay to have the government control the contents of my womb.

  • 4. Sarahd said:

    You might also want to check out Cecily's latest post at Uppercase woman.

    http://zia.blogs.com/wastedbirthcontrol/

  • 5. Melissa said:

    I completely agree and I have a hard time understanding the religious and political ideology that would allow the stripping of such important rights for women.

  • 6. dana said:

    I honestly don't think this air quote thing is as big a deal as people think. I work in the healthcare industry and no one and no legislation is going to put the mother's care second to the baby's. Not going to happen.

    I'm part of the ol' 8% --the undecided vote. And I have a uterus. I don't like John McCain, but I do tire of hearing how "scared" everyone is of him, as though he's some complete radical who can single-handedly overturn legislation overnight. But I expect you'll get a lot of the predictable "he's scary" comments.

  • 7. Kristen said:

    Yep yep. Great post, great point. I am counting down the days until we can boot this man back to Arizona. (Sorry, Arizona.)

  • 8. Krista said:

    Thanks for sharing these, Heather. I was so mad I couldn't see straight during that part of the debate. I do not consider myself pro-choice or pro-life. I believe in a person's right to die with dignity, and I believe in a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy if her health or life is in danger. I don't agree with abortion on demand, but as a woman who lost my child due to complications in a stillbirth and nearly died myself due to the complications, I just wanted to reach through the tv and strangle that bastard!! I don't need a politician to tell me what I can and can't do with my own body should I, God forbid, ever go through that horrific experience again. Which is just one more reason THIS Midwestern Republican is voting for Obama this year!

  • 9. momof4 said:

    I am voting for McCain for many reasons, one of which is that he is pro life. I know I am an odd girl out around here, but that is fine. I still like the blog even though we couldn't be more opposite if we tried.

    Disagree, without being disagreeable.

  • 10. kelli said:

    “the courage of a pregnant mother to bring her child into the world and the compassion of civil society to meet her needs and those of her newborn baby.”

    umm...correct me if i am wrong, but this is the party that feels welfare should not exist, but some how the compassion of civil society will meet her needs?

    maybe he should place all of the uninsured babies on his personal insurance to make sure they are cared for, think he will go for that...

  • 11. Jenna said:

    My father called me this morning and asked if I was voting for McCain... Hoping that maybe in the last 48 hours some experience had altered me into a conservative.
    Too bad he lives in a (very) blue state (Mi.) and I live in a (usually) red state (Co.)

    He tried to tell me that Palin has more experience than Obama because she is the governor of the biggest state in the union. I told him that there are more elk in Alaska than people...

    I can't wait for our Christmas reunion.

    Also: On the subject of abortion my favorite bumper sticker is "keep your rosaries off my ovaries."

  • 12. 3baybchicks said:

    I couldn't agree more. In addition to the raging abortion issue, there is the frightening reality that by voting for McCain, Sarah Palin could someday be president. Ask yourself, is that really what we want for the US?

  • 13. Sara said:

    I try not to vote for presidents based on abortion beliefs. Mostly because abortion will probably NEVER come in front of the President. It'll be a judicial issue or something that won't even make it through congress. But I will vote based on gay marriage rights and the war, which still goes anti-McCain.

  • 14. Songwraith said:

    How very "courageous" of you to dive into politics at the risk of alienating about 39% of your readership. You saved me from tuning in on other facets of the liberal media.
    I think you are a uniquely talented and creative writer--but I'd rather not hear about your politics.

  • 15. Rebecca said:

    I agree with what those other bloggers wrote, but I disagree that we should vote based on one issue. Single issue voting has done nothing but harm for this country. It's time we used a more nuanced approach when it comes to politics.

  • 16. Don said:

    The notion that women and doctors would game the, 'if the mother's life is in danger' clause to justify an abortion even when the mother life isn't in danger, is a disgusting insult no matter which side of the abortion issue you are on. Safeguards can certainly be included to reduce abuse. Safeguards MUST be included for the mother's health/life regardless.

    There is much cruelty afoot.

  • 17. Krista said:

    Dana - I didn't see your post before I posted mine. I'm glad you work in an atmosphere where the mother's life is put above the baby's; however, it's not that way everywhere. The hospital where my son was born is run by the Catholic church, and throughout their history, they have always chosen the life of the baby over the life of the mother. I can't say what is in their official protocol these days, but as little as 15-20 years ago, it was official policy to save the child first, then worry about the mom. In my case, Connor was past saving - he had already died when I arrived at the hospital. Otherwise, God only knows what would have happened to me.

  • 18. Amelia Sprout said:

    I love your politics, and the fact that you have featured two of my favorite blogs too. To those who immediately want to dismiss this as just another liberal thing, read the posts. They matter, and I can say that as someone who is not a fan of abortion, but who very much liked living through a life threatening pregnancy.

  • 19. Ann said:

    When McCain gives birth through his penis, I will then be willing to listen to him about legislating MY UTERUS.

  • 20. Kim said:

    Sorry to go against the majority here but McCain's feelings about abortion are one of the main reasons I am voting for him. Do I think he is going to win? No, I don't - which makes me very nervous for the future of our country.

  • 21. Loretta said:

    I am terrified of McCain/Palin. I'm definitely Pro-choice. I've been a single low-income parent. I've had unplanned, unwanted pregnancies. I was so naive, I didn't even realize abortion was an option. My daughters are grown now, and (thankfully) we have loving, healthy relationships. But I've stressed to them the difficulty of having children before they are ready. Teenagers are in no way ready for the demands of parenthood. It limits your choices in life, and makes everything much harder than it should be.

    Palin wants to send women back to the dark ages. The combination of reversing Roe vs Wade and denying girls basic sex education leaves them in an extremely precarious situation.

    I'm apalled at the otherwise intelligent women I know who intend to vote for McCain/Palin.

  • 22. Anonymous said:

    I agree about splitting the U.S. into two countries, too bad we're so economically interdependent. I love Dooce, but couldn't disagree more on her politics.

    As a pro-life woman, who has been unable to get pregnant for years now, the complete and utter disrespect for the uniqueness and preciousness of human life continues to astonish me. How a baby being "unwanted" makes it any less of a life, I will never understand.

  • 23. Suzy said:

    Thanks for your imput, but no thanks. I'll be voting for McCain/Palin.

  • 24. McKenzie said:

    This is not an issue I go to the polls for. And the reason for abortion being a non issue for me is because abortions laws vary form state to state. I live in a state where you have to have parental consent to have an abortion however the next state over (I live in the city on the border of both these states) does not enforce the same consent law. 18 state already have legislation that bans partial birth abortions. Also 18 states have a waiting period however only 11 states enforce it.
    So to me Abortion isn't something a presidental canidate can affect. HOWEVER-it is something that my state law makers can influence. And that is why it is just as important to vote in the state elections and well as the federal.

  • 25. AloeWishus said:

    Any politician or political party who has an agenda that includes trying to strip me of my rights by turning religious doctrine into law is scary. Period.

    Bottom line: VOTE!

    Don't get lazy just because the polls show a lead for Obama. Use your voice, use your vote.

  • 26. dooce said:

    Please read the posts I linked to before you comment. Otherwise you look dumb.

  • 27. Sarah said:

    Re: 9. momof4:

    Please don't get it twisted: McCain is NOT pro-life. He is anti-choice. He is pro-unborn fetuses. He is pro-POTENTIAL life. He is pro-life-before-it-actually-needs-resources-in-this-world. After it is born, he ignores its needs, and the needs of its mother.

  • 28. Caren said:

    I was screaming at the TV when he made these comments. This is the man who voted against insurance companies covering birth control, against free rape kits for women who've been sexually assaulted, and voted against SCHIP. He's obviously a man who really cares about women and children.

  • 29. laura said:

    Abortion is the very reason why i cannot ever vote Democrat.
    Ever.

    My family has adopted five children - all special needs. All who might've been aborted because they were special needs. They weren't and now my family is more blessed because of the children we have.

    i'm not particulary fond of McCain but i cannot and will not vote Democrat in this day and age.

  • 30. adrienne said:

    the idea of roe v. wade being overturned is impossible for me to contemplate. however, i have increasing faith in the american people that the right decision will be made on nov 4th.

  • 31. dooce said:

    I REPEAT: Please read the posts I linked to before you comment. Otherwise you look dumb.

  • 32. grace said:

    As someone who has worked in the medical industry for some time now and seeing the things I have seen, I believe in both the miracle of birth and the necessity of abortion.

    I think sometimes people who are pro-life automatically assume pro-choice is a pseudonym for "KILL ALL BABIES" instead of meaning the right to make a choice. I'm pro-choice for the right to choose whether or not to have a baby, whether or not I exercise my right to vote, whether or not to have one more twinkie.

    All I want as a human being is the right to choose what I do to and what happens to my body. I don't think it is right to let someone else choose that for me. I am no man's property. I belong to myself.

  • 33. jill said:

    I'm sorry, but NO where in the history of the US does it say, we DESERVE health care. Why do democrats think that everyone is entitled? It's a judgement call... If you work hard you earn the right, it's not just to be given to everyone.

    NO guarantees in life baby...

    ps... I am unemployed with NO insurance and still believe this to be. Also, my mom died from heart failure because she stopped taking her high blood pressure medicine because she thought she couldn't afford it any longer. Her fatal flaw was not asking for help from her family, but never did she think she should be just GUARANTEED health care from the universe. She wasn't a martyr either.

    People who have money, easily think that everyone should receive as well, as I think I remember Heather stating that she would easily give up some of her hard earned money to help those without. In my opinion though, it's easy to think you'd give it when you have it. But those who don't have, shouldn't have to give as well as they shouldn't expect to receive!!

    Those of you who think you're going to get some fantastic tax break because you're in the Middle Class range, you just better hope your company doesn't go and lay you off in a year or two because their taxes have risen and they don't have enough money left to pay for your salary!

    just my opinion of course...

  • 34. bluegirl said:

    Comments like Sara's prompt me to say: if you think the president's views on your hot button issues don't matter, please consider how much the Supreme Court has changed in the last 8 years. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito were nominated by GW Bush, and significantly altered the tenor of the Court. If Justice Stevens (88 years old) retires, SCOTUS will be 4-3 conservative-liberal, with Justice Kennedy as the lone indie.
    The choice we make this election will likely have long-lasting repercussions on issues like abortion, gay marriage, gun control, and habeas corpus for prisoners in Guantanamo Bay. If any of those happen to be important to you, please research the candidates and VOTE!

  • 35. Sarah said:

    AND, Heather I wish you'd do a post about McCain's other anti-woman votes, other than the abortion thing. He voted AGAINST the Lily Ledbetter Equal Pay Act! Saying it would open up employers to too many lawsuits! FOR NOT PAYING WOMEN THE SAME AS MEN!!! Even if you are anti-choice, if you are female and in the work force, McCain should still scare the crap out of you.

  • 36. Ellen said:

    My question is: When did being "Pro-Choice" turn into being "Pro-Abortion"?

  • 37. almost vegetarian said:

    He is a scary little man, indeed. But, as scary as he is, Sarah Palin and her asking her local library how, exactly, one goes about banning books makes me positively whimper with fear.

  • 38. Kristy said:

    I was just wondering, after reading your post yesterday, would you vote for McCain had you had the same mindset and values as you did in college?

  • 39. Amy Kate said:

    I always love hearing the term "pro-abortion" - are there really people that are "pro-abortion"? I was visiting family in downstate Illinois a few weeks ago, and honest to god, they (women, in their late teens, early 20s) talked about Obama being "pro-abortion" and democrats in general being so. I had to walk away (my blood pressure had been rising since they proclaimed that they "really really like that Sarah Palin. How great to have a woman that close to the White House!"). I came back and said to them that while I did not want to talk politics because I love them and it would turn ugly as we disagree, that I don't think there are people around who are PRO abortion, like approaching pregos on the street with a hanger saying, "Hey toots! Wanna have some fun? Let's rib that sucka outta your ute!" NO ONE LIKES ABORTION. But it is necessary. It needs to be SAFE. LEGAL. RARE. It needs to be an option, you know, a CHOICE for women, families, young girls who are in no position- for reasons that I don't need to be privy to (nor does John McCain, Barack Obama, or anyone else)- to bring a child into the world. IT HAPPENS. It happens in "innocent" ways (oops, no condom), it happens in ugly ways (incest, rape), it happens in ways that nature just makes happen (health/life of mother, no quality of life for baby once born). So yes, there needs to be a choice available. I know that I'm kind of ranting all over the place, but I just have been on a tirade about it lately.
    And kudos to the other commenter for noting that he wouldn't provide health care for this kid once it popped out! That's the other thing - abortion rights - yes, an important issue, but that shouldn't be THE issue (especially in light of everything else going on in our country) we're hanging our hats on. There are so many other issues (very intertwind) that have so much more impact on our lives, our children's lives, and, yes, John, that have more impact on those of us "brave" enough to have children and raise them despite soaring health care costs, high gas prices, poor educational standards, and so on. ARGH!

  • 40. Courtney said:

    What really drove me crazy about that was just mere minutes before making the airquoted comments, he'd railed about being a federalist in the context of healthcare. A federalist, who believes that the government shouldn't interfere with Americans' choice regarding their healthcare, it should be a free market not regulated by the government. If the government stepped in, they'd lose their choice! About healthcare! My husband and I were screaming at Obama on the TV screen during the later abortion segment of the debate: TELL HIM HE SHOULD BE A FEDERALIST ABOUT ABORTION THEN TOO! ISN'T THAT CHOICE A PART OF MY OWN PERSONAL DECISION ABOUT "HEALTHCARE"? Augh.

  • 41. Patience St. James said:

    Abortion is the reason I will never, ever vote Republican. I don't care what your personal beliefs are on the matter--you do not get to choose for others, not what they eat, not what they do sexually, and certainly not what they do medically. It astounds me that the party who claims to be for state's rights and personal rights and responsibility also are strongly for 'moral' legislation to keep others from doing things that make them uncomfortable, and it disturbs me greatly that women would vote for such horrible people.

  • 42. JO said:

    I won't vote for John McCain largely because of his views on abortion. However, he does not sicken me in any way. I disagree with him, but he has led a great life and made difficult decisions many times in his life. He is a man, unlike the vast majority of Pro-life men, who has faced decisions and situations worse than an unwanted pregnancy.

    It's worth noting that Obama said roughly the following in the debate:

    "I fully support making late-term abortions illegal except to save the life or the health of the mother."

    What did he mean by late-term? Hard to say, completely ambiguous. Did he vote against the bill that would have made so-called partial birth abortions, done almost exclusively to save the life of the mother, illegal, even when the health of the mother was endangered? NO. He voted present.

    Obama is no saint wrt abortion rights either. He is clearly the better choice for those of us who value abortion rights, but he is not passionate about the issue.

  • 43. Phoo-d said:

    For the record, I don't agree with McCain's stance on this one, but what I find more horrifying is that people will base their vote on this single issue. How frightening is it that in the face of two failed wars, a global financial crisis, looming problems with Medicare and Social Security, some people are basing their vote ONLY on which way a candidate feels about abortion. That makes me afraid, very afraid.

  • 44. Jodie said:

    Choice is just that. It's a woman's choice to have a child or not, in consultation with her spouse, her doctor and her clergy. That's what Roe v. Wade is about. Just because someone is pro-choice that doesn't mean that I want everyone to have an abortion. I would like it to be safe, legal and rare. I don't understand the problem most anti-abortion people have with it. If you're against abortion then don't have one. But don't infring upon my right to choose.

    The scary fact is that if McCain is the next president, then when he appoints one or two new Supreme court justices, then Roe v. Wade will likely be overturned. States would have the option to make abortion illegal again. Resulting in many women choosing illegal abortions and possibly death as a result of them... just like in the bad old days prior to Roe v. Wade.

  • 45. jonniker said:

    When Alexa casually mentioned during the debate that his policies could mean that she'd be dead, I was stopped in my tracks. Seriously. No one puts it in better, more human perspective than she does, and though I sent it to everyone I know before I saw this, I am so grateful that you're giving her post an even larger audience than I could have.

    Thank you.

  • 46. Anonymous said:

    Long time lurker, first time poster.

    I was so offended by McCain's choice of words - calling it the "pro-abortion" movement. As Barack Obama pointed out, no one is pro-abortion. Why can't we agree that both sides want to reduce the number of abortions? The pro-CHOICE movement wants to keep abortion safe and legal while also investing in prevention such as sex education, family planning, birth control resources and counseling.

    When the pro-life movement actually puts into place plans to help the mother after giving birth - with childcare, education resources, job training, etc - then I might change my tune. But the pro-lifers I have had the pleasure of talking to are only concerned with the birth of the child and don't expect to put any resources towards these babies or their mothers once they are born.

    And don't even get me started on McCain's laugh and roll of the eyes when talking about the mother's "health" - his quotes, not mine. How any woman can vote for this man is beyond me.

  • 47. cck said:

    It was incredibly insulting. I reacted strongly to what Julie wrote. The idea that anyone can dictate my health care decisions scares me to death.

    Please, keep the hell away from my uterus.

  • 48. Pro, just pro said:

    What I've always hated about this issue were the terms used for your stance - you're either pro-life (can you hear the choirs of angels singing??) or pro-choice (hmmm, I think I’ll flip a coin to see if I’ll get an abortion today…). It’s not like pro-choicer are out there trying to persuade pregnant women to get an abortion (“Oh come on Suzy, everybody’s doing it”), and yet, what, the government thinks that women aren’t smart enough to make this life-changing decision on our own – so they better do it for us? I’m not pro-life, but I’m not pro-death either. I’m pro-making-the-best-decision-for-my-situation.

  • 49. Anonymous said:

    I wonder if McCain's daughter was raped and got pregnant if he would assume that she would have the "courage and compassion" to have it. Government needs to stay the hell out of my insides.

  • 50. Stacy said:

    Sigh! I will be glad when this election is over so you will go back to being funny.

  • 51. Lee said:

    I know what he was trying to say there. He was trying to say that a woman could exaggerate a relatively mild complication in order to get an abortion, on the grounds that her health is at risk. I get that. But I still think he's full of shit. Pray tell, Senator, at which point does my health matter to you? If there's a 15% chance that the pregnancy would kill me, would you force me to carry that pregnancy to term? What about 25%? 35%? Really, I want to know the point at which the chance that I MIGHT DIE starts to matter to you.

  • 52. Sarah said:

    To JO:

    Late-term is generally taken to mean third trimester.

    And Obama did not vote for that bill because it did NOT include a provision for the life or health of the mother. It just flat-out banned partial-birth abortions without any exceptions for the mother. That's why he (and many others - it did not pass) didn't feel comfortable voting for it.

  • 53. Heather said:

    Ditto, ditto, ditto. While I'm not choosing to vote for Obama because of this single issue (but I will vote for him because of the many issues on which I agree with him), I do think it's important to keep in mind that the next president will appoint at least one person to the supreme court. The court could be asked to clairfy/modify/change the Roe decision. While I think it would have to be something pretty radical to get the court to take the case, the very possibility makes me consider a presidential candidate's opinion on the issue.

    I appreciated the moment in the debate when Obama said that nobody is "pro-abortion". Exactly.

  • 54. Patrick said:

    #39 - There is nothing innocent about "forgetting" to use a condom and winding up pregnant. Rape is another thing. For crying out loud people...live with your choices, mistake or not.

  • 55. Laura College said:

    Are you kidding? Heather, you seem like a reasonable human being, but you're a parent! Haven't you heard about Obama voting to continue LIVE BIRTH ABORTION? And McCain sickens you? Seriously, I realize that we all have different political views, but this seems pretty cut-and-dried to me. McCain wasn't my first choice for a Republican candidate, but at least he doesn't want parents giving birth to children they don't want, then leaving them in a biohazard room to die. If you're going to boil this election down to one issue, my choice is clear: McCain/Palin

  • 56. cck said:

    One more thing. Beyond the words that McCain uses to pander to his base, I hated the air quotes.

    I hated the air quotes combined with the sound of him sucking his teeth. I cannot stand to listen to that for the next four years.

    GO KNOCK ON DOORS. VOLUNTEER TO DRIVE YOUR NEIGHBOR TO THE POLLS. GO VOTE!!!

  • 57. Lucy said:

    I'm sad that our country can't have two better candidates than McCain and Obama. More to the point, I don't see Rowe overturned anytime soon. It's too much of a hot potato politically. Bush the Second is anti-abortion and nothing changed.

    Neither of these clowns, uh, I mean candidates, is going to touch abortion with a ten foot poll.

    Love the blog too!

  • 58. dooce said:

    Yes, Stacy, because being funny is so much more important than my civil rights.

  • 59. Sarah said:

    Laura College, do your research. Obama voted "present" on the partial-birth abortion bill because it didn't include any exceptions for the life or health of the mother. He has said he would vote for a ban as long as it included that exception.

  • 60. poptart said:

    He is a cluless ass. I do not understand how the masses thinks he is in touch with today's needs. Abortion is not the governments business. Plain and simple.

  • 61. Jamie said:

    I shared Alexa's post on google reader last night because I felt it was something everyone should read.

    It's a great post. I'm off to read Julie's now.

  • 62. Annie said:

    I am, frankly, baffled by much of the rhetoric coming from the conservative side regarding women's health and reproductive choices -- namely abortion, obviously. It seems as though they think women are just RUNNING OUT TO HAVE ALL SORTS OF IMMORAL AND CRAZY SEX ALL THE DAMN TIME SO THEY CAN GET THEIR ABORTIONS! ABORTIONS! MY GOD WE JUST LOVE GETTING ABORTIONS!

    I don't know a single woman who has had an abortion without a second thought. Even if she hasn't had to struggle with guilt (like many of us raised in Christian or other conservative households do), she has had to struggle with how she is perceived by friends and family or even her lover.

    The other day, I saw a conservative blog ranting about how us liberals want women to go around having wild, unprotected sex just so we will get knocked up and have abortions, thereby (and I shit you not, they actually said this) "Fund the multi-billion dollar per year abortion mill industry."

    My mom still refuses to vote for Obama because, "he is okay with killing babies."

  • 63. leigh said:

    I understand the sentiment behind the two blog posts, but having watched the debate I'm not so sure that's what was meant. When there is a life threatening health concern with a mother, reasonable professionals would interpret the law to save the baby if possible, but also preserve the life of the mother. I don't agree with abortion, so I wouldn't agree with an abortion as a precautionary measure, but medicine is so advanced that a baby could be born 4 months early and still become a normally functioning human being. If the life of the mother is in danger, her health should come first while trying to save the baby, if possible. I'm not sure John McCain wouldn't agree with that. Abortion cannot be made to use as a precautionary tool where is pregnancy becomes uncomfortable or inconvenient further along women can terminate at will. Pregnancy has inherent risks! You assume those risks by getting pregnant.

    Furthermore, women who complain about it being "their uterus, their choice" - yeah, it is your choice...to get pregnant. Having unprotected/no contraceptive sex removes your choice to get pregnant. I wish people would just be a little bit more responsible instead of always looking for a way out.

  • 64. Emily said:

    Heather--

    I love your writing. I repeat-LOVE YOUR WRITING. I never miss a day of reading each and every post. I must say though, please get over the fact that every single person in this country (including your readers) have varying opinions on every issue. It's becoming very clear that your "open-mind" is narrowing more and more every day by consistently closing the door on any opinion that isn't yours. And, hey, I'm even voting for Obama. We're on the same side and I'm still getting tired of your rants.

  • 65. Anonymous said:

    Since when are we "guaranteed" insurance? I am a single mother of 3 children and have worked my butt off to insure they are covered by insurance. The government should stay out of it.

  • 66. grudge girl said:

    Thank you for those links. They were so affecting. I immediately posted the links on my facebook, knowing it would piss off my conservative friends and family members, because I have the tiny hope that one of these entries will make one of them think in a broader way about this subject. (I'm hoping for my 18 yr old niece, who I love so much in spite of her extreme conservative views and troublingly uncomplicated sense of rightousness, and who is like the Lutheran twin of the teenager you used to be.) It's worth pissing people off if you can help even one person expand his or her perspective.

    As I'm sure you know.

  • 67. Sarah said:

    Am I going to get in trouble for commenting so much? So many people are uninformed...

    To Lucy (#57): McCain himself can't overturn it, of course, but the Supreme Court Justices he appoints CAN. Right now there is only a one-vote margin (yes, ONE VOTE) in the court that would keep Roe there. That one vote is Ginsburg, who is, well, old. It is very likely to project that the president we elect on Nov. 4 will have at least one, if not two, appointments to the Supreme Court.

  • 68. GEORGE! said:

    HOW DARE YOU WRITE ABOUT SOMETHING YOU CARE ABOUT ON YOUR VERY OWN BLOG!

    I can't even talk about politics with my family, I just avoid saying anything whenever Daniel starts to talk about Obama.

  • 69. Hannah said:

    I saw a great comment recently: "If the fetus you save is born gay, will you continue to fight for its rights?"

  • 70. Nelson said:

    When I read Alexa's entry I teared up. I watched the debate and McCain's response caught me as inappropriate generally for various reasons. There are a lot of things I don't understand about extremely religious people. For example I can't understand why Bush would oppose abortion on moral grounds but be fine with lying to the American people in an attempt to start a war in Iraq that would kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqs and thousands of Americans. The same religion that allowed slavery to exist in this country as a biblical right. This things are beyond my understanding. But as I heard McCain speak it occured to me that the value of an unborn life is given more weight by them than a living breathing person. As a father I now understand that I and my wife would both give our lives willingly for our children. And as Alexa said the choice of aborting the living being wiggling inside of you is not one made on a whim. Decisions on when these procedures should or should not apply should be left in the hands of doctors and parents not in the hands of people driven blind by religion. A religion that can be twisted to make slavery and war appropriate. A religion that can change to fit the holder's needs is not an objective body that deserves to be foisted upon the masses.

  • 71. kevin said:

    LAURA 29;
    you say that in this day and age, you must vote republican.
    are you referring to "this day and age" where our own government eavedrops
    on everyday citizens? where they condone torture? where they have unregulated the banking and investing system to where we now give up OUR tax dollars to bail out billionaires? "in this day and age" where we attack countries that have not provoked or attacked us, and in turn, spent thousands of american lives and spent billions of dollars, and made corporations rich, where youre government lied to take us to war, where the environment is not cared for, especially if its stewardship is in the way of making a buck, where dumbness is rewarded, where to question the government is mocked as "unamerican"?
    THOSE days and ages??? mostly, or almost exesclusively brought to you by a
    REPUBLICAN ADMINASTRATION???
    the mind boggles.....

  • 72. Anonymous said:

    Is there really a separation between religion and the state in this country? Between the gay marriage issues, abortion rights issues and stem-cell research issues.....seems like there is actually very little that is not governed by religion here.

  • 73. jennifer said:

    The real point is missed when politics are involved. It is kinda like being "green". Why waste time,the baby, mental anguish, unnecessary medical procedures and the wondering about what we got rid of for the rest of our lives.We women need to take responsibility and not get pregnant in the first place. Why torture ourselves with the decision to have an abortion when we could just choose responsibity in the first place. Let's not leave it to the government to control what happens in our womb, let us take control of our own wombs.

  • 74. maresi said:

    I've read both posts, and largely agree. However, I'm far, far more scared of the effect on women's health issues from bully obstetrician-gynecologists and their propaganda machines waging war on normal physiological birth. Talk about removing choice, and using fear as a weapon...
    Please read Pushed by Jennifer Block to learn more about how much of the current hospital, physician, and insurance systems are assaulting women everyday.

  • 75. Becky..Absent Minded Housewife said:

    I'm pissed about McCains 5k health deduction. He really has no clue to what it takes to privately insure a healthy and FERTILE adult woman.

    As for abortion, I'm loathe to have my uterus legislated. I have no opinion on a right to choose but I do have an opinion on decisions about my own health and body. Reproduction and sex, not exactly a black and white issue.

    And not an issue I want to hear about coming out of the mouth of a known womanizer.

  • 76. Cyndi said:

    Voters need to understand that YES the next president WILL have the power to overturn Roe v Wade and many other important legislation. Educate yourself about how the Supereme Court works people. Justice Stevens is not well and it is a very real possibility that the next President will be appointing his replacement. They are so close to a majority already, it will only take one more vote to change your life (and your rights) for a very long time. And I am not just talking about Roe v Wade either. The Supreme Court has very real power. Learn it, understand it, and VOTE.

  • 77. Jessica said:

    If anyone has picked up a Cosmo for November lately, they have a fantastic article about the differences in the candidates policies in regards to women. Everything from title IX to health insurance and of course abortion. Just reading the two compared side by side like that is enough to make every woman disgusted by McCain.

    On a side note: I spent over 2 hrs on the phone with my doctor and my insurance company the other day battling out whether or not the insurance would cover my $25 birth control prescription...yeah they covered $5...thanks for helping me not get pregnant and become a drain on society! My "health" is more important than any other topic up for discussion in any debate and McCain and his air quotes can shove it!

  • 78. Tanya said:

    1. It's probably a good thing he's running for President, and not Supreme Court Justice then, right? (Hint: The President can't overturn Roe v Wade.)

    2. Even if enough liberal Justices died/retired and were replaced with conservative judges (With a Democrat-majority congress to fight the nominations? Impossible.) who wanted to overturn Roe v Wade, that doesn't mean abortion becomes illegal. It just means that it stops being federally mandated. The decision on abortion would go back to the individual states.

    So relax. Jeez. Hysteria isn't going to help anyone.

  • 79. gingela5 said:

    I don't believe in abortion--that being said I'm not voting for EITHER party.

  • 80. uc freak said:

    I would like to see every pro-life person adopt an unwanted child, before they can decide they are pro-life. If that happened, maybe there would be no need for abortion.
    Also, for those who say if you work hard, you can afford healthcare, I disagree. There are many people who have to take low paying jobs with no benefits, for their own personal reasons. And, we all rely on these jobs to get done. I always think, 'but for the grace of God' that could be me. To quote 'Barnyard'- A strong man helps himself, a stronger man helps others.

  • 81. Anonymous said:

    Geez...I am tired of all this McCain bashing. I'm an intelligent woman, and I'm sick of this knee-jerk reaction to anything that is Republican. People, Roe vs. Wade will NEVER be overturned. Republicans HAVE to be pro-life. Democrats HAVE to be pro-choice.

    Did you hear Barack Obama the other night? Or Joe Biden? When they spoke about gay marriage (and their LACK of support for it)? These are our liberals?

    And for your information, I'm voting third party.

  • 82. kathryn said:

    I know you will get flack for this post, as you always do with anything of the political. But speaking for those of us who do not have a popular blog for a platform, THANK YOU!

  • 83. Anonymous said:

    Alexa's post gave me the chills (and for anyone who has just read the Dooce blurb and not the whole thing, I highly recommend you read it all, the blurb doesn't capture even half the power of the post). Every time McCain say's "Pro-abortion" I cringe. Who in their right mind would be "for" something that is so hard to go through? As someone whose been there and had to make that tough choice I find it personally offensive. I am Pro-Choice, not Pro-Abortion, there is a VERY big difference.

  • 84. Sharon said:

    I have both a uterus and a brain. And I'm still voting for McCain/Palin.

  • 85. Cheyenne said:

    McCain is the lesser of two evils, so to speak, and I, for one, will NOT be voting for that other one. Not by a long shot. Not in your dreams or anybody else's dreams. Never.

  • 86. Kristen said:

    I read both of these great ladies blogs and appreciate them so much for being able to say what so many of us want to say but can't. And thank you Heather for sending the masses to their sites so that maybe more people can understand just how dangerous it would be for John McCain to be in office.

  • 87. HorribleLicensePlates said:

    Oh I know. I just cringed when McCain started talking about this. How can you not be outraged at what he was saying? I just looked over at my husband and we both took another drink.

  • 88. Scargosun said:

    The spirit in me tells me that abortion is wrong...for me. My spirit also tells me that absolutely
    NO ONE
    EVER
    has the right to tell me what to do with my body, her body or his body.

    This is not the only campaign issue and it actually should not be a campaign issue at all but I am going to fight until I have no fight left for my fellow Americans. This government has no right to tell me or anyone else what to do with their bodies.

  • 89. Elizabeth said:

    And who are you going to vote for then? Obama supports the ban on 'partial-birth' abortions. It's a medical procedure which is, as far as I know, only used because it is necessary for medical reasons. As I see it, both major party candidates are willing to tell women what they can and can not do with their reproductive organs. As a woman who struggled for four years with infertility and who has read those blogs you quote and many others like them I know what can go wrong, and I really can't find either candidate's position on the issue acceptable.

  • 90. Laura said:

    I'm pro-life. So are all democrats.

    I am pro- programs that provide life-sustaining services, including food, shelter, and healthcare to women, families and children.

    I am pro- bringing life into the world in a responsible manner. So I support sexuality education and healthcare programs that empower women and their partners to decide when to become parents by providing them with knowledge and access to family planning resources, including accurate and practical information regarding abstinence, natural family planning, barrier methods, and hormonal contraception.

    I am pro-mothers. I believe all women who become pregnant should have a legitimate choice - to decide whether they wish to parent a child, become a birthmother, or terminate the pregnancy. I believe that the government has a role in ensuring that all of these choices are real possibilities, and not theoretical abstractions. ("Deciding to parent" is great, but if the government is so committed to the sanctity of the life inside my hypothetical womb, I want you to promise my future child that I will have the resources to be a good parent.)

    Nobody is pro-abortion.
    But my vote goes to the politician who recognizes that, even when all of the above programs are in place (... all of them, surprisingly, the kinds of programs that conservatives generally oppose), there will still be a need for abortions. And when that need arises, the decision of whether and how and when to terminate the pregnancy is a medical one. My vote goes to the politician who recognizes that he is not my doctor, and he is not my conscience, and he is not God - he cannot possibly imagine all of the possible scenarios that will dictate what the "right" choice would be in any given situation. So he will trust that I - and all women - are capable of making the best decisions for ourselves and our children.

  • 91. Emily said:

    Heather, thank you for those two links. I am not a single issue voter in general, but I truly believe this issue is SO important to the general wellbeing of women that it would be impossible for me to vote for anyone who discards the "health" of women in such a flip manner.

    As someone who has struggled with infertility for three years, and has had a medical abortion to remove an ectopic pregnancy (that was absolutely wanted and planned), I am horrified by the idea that there are people out there who would think that even THAT is immoral.

    I also don't see this as a single issue, but rather an all encompassing view of women's rights in general. The way McCain spoke of women who have late-term abortions for medical reasons was very telling of his views in general, and combined with Palin's fundamentalist worldview, I was pushed over the edge. I was not an Obama supporter, but I am now.

  • 92. renee said:

    "It's becoming very clear that your "open-mind" is narrowing more and more every day by consistently closing the door on any opinion that isn't yours. "

    I agree. When I read your "mortified" post the other day it occurred to me that you are an all-or-nothing gal. You really go deep into your beliefs and then close your mind to the other options. Which is fine, this is your blog, this is your life, but it is kind of ironic as it is the opposite of what you preach so proudly.

  • 93. Anonymous said:

    to #67 -

    The president alone cant elect a new Supreme Court Justice that would sway the vote on overturning Roe V Wade. You think a democratic Senate would let McCain elect a conservative, Pro-Life Justice? Prolly not.

  • 94. KC said:

    I have a hard time reading these comments about the government ignoring the needs of its citizens when it comes to health care issues. For single mothers and families who cant afford health insurance there are several programs available where families dont have to pay a dime, such as the CHIP program.

    I just have a hard time wanting to rely on the government for health care. They have done a horrible job at running Social Security, and if you want to see how government really runs health care talk to a Vet who has had the wonderful pleasure of using the VA for care services and see how smoothly their experiance went.

    I for one, am more scared of becoming a socialist society and destroying the capitalist fire that makes this country great. What happened to Americans working hard and taking care of themselves, providing opportunity for their businesses to grow. Now days we are to quick to turn to the government for handouts when things get tough. I understand that there will always be people in need and there are programs availble to take care of them.

    Obama is all about socializing health care, as well as getting rid of those evil companies who have actually made a profit. Who do you think will pay the taxes that he intends to raise on the corperate world. We will cause they will raise prices on their products to cover the costs of the extra taxes they have to pay. I got a C+ in Economics in college and I can understand that policy.

    In the fragile state that our Economy is in do we really need more taxes put on struggling companies that are barely making ends meet. I have had my own business, and know how it is to do $300,000 a year in business and barely make it cause of all the costs that are involved in running your own business. And believe me you pay a lot of taxes on the money your business makes, at the end of the month there isn't very much left over for your own pay check. It is not that I make $300,000 a year but my business does that much in sales a year. If the taxes were to increase for my type of business it would cripple my business and probably make it fail, along with several other businesses in this country. That is why Obama scares the shit out of me!

  • 95. Anonymous said:

    ok, coming from somebody who had an abortion because of a past rape experience, it scares me to read comments from women...(esp. women!) who think that I didnt sit there and claw my hair out thinking about my future, what abortion meant and how it was going to effect me...what it would be like to raise a child from an experience that took many years of tears, confusion and self-hate to comes to terms with. this does not mean that i wouldnt love that child, but at that point in my life i was not able to deal with looking at a child who was not produced out of love, but was produced out of greed, anger and hate. call me selfish...go ahead, i dont fucking care.

    rape was not my choice, but my happy, healthy future was.

  • 96. Anonymous said:

    Thank you, Heather, for continuing to bring up issues that are important. I LOVE your blog, and the mix of light and serious topics.

    For the people who only want you to be fluffy and light, I suggest they stop reading and go back their bonbons and Days of Our Lives...

    The rest of us CARE about what's going on in this country and aren't afraid to hear and talk about it.

    Thank you, thank you, thank you!

  • 97. Anonymous said:

    Wow Kev--You are so good at spitting out the sound bites!!

  • 98. AmyH said:

    When J-Mc made those air quotes when he was talking about the health of the mother I wanted to scream. HOW is it that pro-life ends when a baby is born? What about the mother's life? Isn't that still valuable?

    And I am so offended that he chooses to call the pro-choice movement the "pro-abortion" movement. I am 100% pro-choice and 100% anti-abortion--for me. I would never judge you for making a different choice and I would certainly never say that ANYONE is pro-abortion. I know that it is a very hard decision and it is never taken lightly.

    Shame on him for his treatment of women, especially given that he has daughters.

  • 99. Anonymous said:

    Yep. Never any emotions involved in politics. Clear, analytical thinking all the way down.
    We're Pro-Choice, not Pro-Abortion! WE want to decide when it's the RIGHT TIME to kill a defenseless baby.
    Get out of my UTERUS government officials! I say when my BABY dies. AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, You CANNOT and SHOULD NOT take the choice away from me whether to nurture a child or be able to afford more songs for my frickin' awesome iPod.

    You (McCain) don't want to defend the helpless! You want to ensure all women are barefoot and pregnant! Bastard! 'Health' has never been used by the 'pro-choice' movement to mean 'almost anything'!! It's mainly been used to get more fetuses dead!

  • 100. Loretta said:

    You're right. I was dumb.

    Those links are powerful. Very well written and definitely make the point. Thank you for sharing.

  • 101. Jessica said:

    My only question to everyone here is how do you justify killing someone. In my opinion a baby is a person the SECOND that conception occurs, the SECOND. Things happen and babies die, things happen and mothers die. It is sad either way. But Before I had my children I told my husband that if anything was to happen to me that they were to save my baby, I would lay down my own life for my children and I can't imagine a mother that wouldn't.

  • 102. Pixelfish said:

    Anon@83: I believe Obama himself noted that nobody is really pro-abortion per se--as abortion is a not-fun, invasive medical procedure. But what pro-choicers are in favour of is access to birth control, unbiased information, and medical options for women that will hopefully prevent the need for abortion in most cases. But every woman should retain the right to make a decision about her body--being pregnant can be a huge bodily change, at best, and a life-threatening situation, at worst--and she should be able to decide for herself. Every time I hear people refer to abortion as a convenience, it makes me see red. There is nothing "convenient" about a costly surgery (although thanks to PP, semi-affordable compared to other surgeries) which you will spend a week or two recovering from. Nobody waves a magic wand and *poof* you aren't pregnant anymore. It's a medical choice.

    Also, I'd like to note that while McCain and Palin talk about equal pay for women, McCain couldn't be bothered to vote on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, but said he would have opposed it anyway, since he said it opened up the possibility for frivolous lawsuits. Basically when McCain talks women's rights, he's insincere. He's used the word "frivolous" to refer to both abortion and equal pay--I can't take him seriously as a candidate that would support me.

  • 103. Krysta said:

    comment #33: "I'm sorry, but NO where in the history of the US does it say, we DESERVE health care. Why do democrats think that everyone is entitled? It's a judgement call... If you work hard you earn the right, it's not just to be given to everyone."

    No, it does not say anything about deserving health care in the written law, but we are talking about people. Maybe it's just me, but if we are valuing life here I think it is fair to say that human beings do deserve access to affordable care. I am not sure what the solution is but when people, like your mother, are dying becasue they are denied care or cannot afford life saving medication while insure companies are profiting, I think there is a call for reform.

    And the part about if you work hard you earn the right to health care is complete bullshit. Nearly 60% of uninsured adults work full time. So working hard doesn't ensure you anything.

  • 104. Kris said:

    I can't wait for November 5th.

    Sigh.

  • 105. RJ said:

    I do not "like" the idea of abortion. I am not "pro-abortion" Who is??

    I urge everyone, regardless of their opinions of abortion to read this article
    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/01/25/my_late_te...

    It is a story of a woman who very much loved and wanted her baby who had to make a gut-wrenching decision. A decision that ANY woman could be faced with. I am pregnant and this does scare me.

    To say that it is irresponsible to call John McCain "Scary" is totally wrong. Please read this story and see how easily your rights can be taken away. See how doctors like the one in this story are leaving the practice for fear of possible prosecution.

    I don't like the idea of abortion, but you cannot legislate morality.

  • 106. Right On said:

    When anyone reduces an election to a single issue--especially one that involves the right to fill an unborn child--it is sad.

    Your original example from Alexa of Flotsam is a perfect example. She puts words in Sen. McCain's mouth that he DID NOT SAY. But that's so typical of the liberal left. He did NOT say having an abortion is the easy way out (that's Alexa's own guilt shining through). If she wants to question what is compassionate, she should ask Obama why he voted not to have hospitals provide care for babies that survived botched abortions. Hmmm. Apparently that is the modicum of compassion the majority of posters here subscribe to.

    All of which is why it is harder and harder to justify any meaningful friendships with anyone who is a bleeding heart Liberal. Many of whom value the life of a convicted murder or child molester more than they do that of an unborn child.

    Stances such as this totally ignore the fact that the vast majority of Americans see the abortion issue in shades of gray...not black or white. Very few think no abortions should ever be allowed in any circustances. And very few think abortions should be allowed at any time for any reason even into the third trimester. Well, except for a few here who reduce everything to a up/down litmus test on abortion. Get a life.

  • 107. Tanya said:

    80. uc freak said: I would like to see every pro-life person adopt an unwanted child, before they can decide they are pro-life

    ---

    Bad example, in this case. The McCains did adopt an "unwanted" child. You haven't noticed that one of their daughters doesn't look like the rest?

  • 108. ErinM said:

    Alexa and Julie are very eloquent. I agree with them wholeheartedly. I am also VERY glad that I have already voted by absentee ballot and you can bet it wasn't for McCain and that backwards woman Palin. I'm curious how many others out there have already voted by absentee.

  • 109. R.E. said:

    I am very pro-choice, but I respect and understand the position of those that are pro-life AND support the government investing in children and mothers at risk financially. Life is magnificent and worthy of being saved and cherished. If you believe that and are willing to follow up, I understand.

    However, I seem to have encountered far more pro-lifers who seem to only really care while battling about the well-being of a baby in someone else's uterus.

    Personally, I think that every woman needs to be able to make the choices best for her own life, and that especially includes protecting her own health.

    How can you be pro-life, but not pro-the life of the mother?

  • 110. Corinna said:

    I love everyone saying that women should just make sure to use contraceptives and they won't get pregnant, so abortion shouldn't be an issue. Guess what? I was an unplanned child, courtesy of condom failure. My brother was a failure of both condoms AND birth control pills. Sometimes you find yourself in that tiny percentage, despite being careful, and having the option to terminate should always be there.

  • 111. The Husband said:

    I am not a fan of abortion. The thing is I don't think anyone else is either. I think that everyone's goal is for there to be fewer abortions instead of more. The difference is how you go about reaching that goal. Do you outlaw and criminalize it or do you educate and encourage the use of contraceptives?

  • 112. megan said:

    i think the term "anti-choice" should be used with more regularity. it is much more accurately descriptive of the associated sentiments than the outdated "pro-life."

  • 113. Molly said:

    #33, jill - I am banging my head against my desk right now.

    #37, almostvegetarian - Right? The fact that the thought even crossed her mind terrifies me more than just about any issue, including people talking about what should or should not be going on in my uterus.

  • 114. robin said:

    Heather, I am so grateful that you are writing about politics, although I know you can't influence everyone, you can present the facts. McCain and Palin scare me, they really do. She is a complete narcissist. To be one heartbeat away from the presidency after being a mayor of a small town and governor of Alaska is beyond frightening. It's true that Obama hasn't been tested, but he is extremely brilliant, his leadership skills are superb and he has the best minds in the country supporting him. And he inspires young people - which is great.

    McCain's tax plans will send this country further into the toilet. How could anyone in their right mind who is not a member of the top five percent in this country even consider voting for them?

    And abortion? That was decided forty years ago. Leave it alone. Women - do we really want the government telling us what we can and cannot do when it comes to bringing a life into this world. I have a twenty year-old daughter and raising her has been the toughest job I've ever done

    As a former writer of "Guiding Light" - which I guess you used to watch - I am thrilled that we women have the chance to really affect the outcome of this election and throw the Republicans out of the White House and Congress. Thanks for taking a leadership role in the discussion.

  • 115. Anonymous said:

    Heather, honestly, Obama with his support of a bill that does not allow babies born alive in abortions the right to medical access scares me MUCH, MUCH more than McCain. See link below on Obama's stances on abortion. Also, if Leta (God forbid) ends up pregnant at 15, do you think she should be allowed to have an abortion without telling you? When she's still required to have you sign field trip permission slips, should any child be allowed to undergo an invasive surgery without notifying her parents?

    http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.14_George_Robert_Obama's%20Abortion%20Extremism_.xml

    The questions about the political stances of presidential candidates about abortion go both ways, IMHO.

  • 116. agree to disagree.... said:

    Abortion really isn't a religious issue, it is a legal issue...taking a life is taking a life...murder isn't a religious issue...I am a pretty liberal feminist...but this issue doesn't belong in that context

  • 117. Sarah said:

    Both Alexa and Julie wrote so, so, SO eloquently on this issue, from their own experiences which, yes, are outside the norm but also in some ways put you SO MUCH CLOSER to the issue.

    As the parent of an extremely premature child myself, I can say that having birthed a child on the "cusp of viability" (in my case, 25-and-change weeks - a bit past the true cusp, but still way, way, WAY too early) having that experience muddies your opinion on the abortion issue so, so much. There is a clinic that performs abortions not too far from our house, and there are always one or two protesters out there. I drove by there this week and, I kid you not, one of their posters could have been a picture of my child on the day she was born. It was like a punch in the gut.

    Many people come out of an experience like mine, or like Alexa's, adamantly pro-life. (I avoid the abortion issue like the plague at March of Dimes functions, lemmetellya.) Many others, myself included, come out of it still strongly pro-choice but also very conflicted. In some places it would still have been legal to terminate my pregnancy. Was my child viable? I don't know, I supposed it depends on how you define "viability". Is a child who requires surfactant and mechanical ventilation to survive "viable"? What if the child is going to have zero quality of life? (I'm thinking things like Tay Sachs here.) And, as Alexa and others have addressed much more eloquently than I will ever be able to, at what point do you make the decision that the mother's life is in too much jeopardy? And yet, my possibly-legal-to-terminate kid is now an obnoxiously precocious, charming, beautiful four year old. How do I square THAT with being pro-choice?

    It makes me almost blindingly angry to think that I once uttered the words, "I'd consider voting for John McCain." A lot has changed in the last eight years, that's for sure, and it's not just about the war in Iraq.

  • 118. CTM said:

    I agree that abortion is a sticky subject and that in reality, it should be someone's choice to live with what can reasonably construed as murder.

    However, none of this makes me reconsider voting for McCain. Abortion is always a "non-issue" that is construed to be so very important. Honestly, it's the last thing on my mind this election.

  • 119. Husband Clothes said:

    Um, voting for McCain is one thing. Voting for Palin--whole new ballpark, baby!

    Just sent my ballot. I'm going to be like Joe the plumber and pretend to be secretive about my vote. Also, like him, I will continue to not have a plumbing license.

    hahahahahhahh

  • 120. Michelle - Tx said:

    I am a yellow dog democrat living in Tx, xCatholic, xMormon, Chritian and married - I am not a fan of bush or what has happened in the last 8 yrs. I am also a women who can not get/stay pregnant. I have tried to adopt special needs chidren (siblings) through tx child protective services and terminated the adoption (a whole other topic of discussion). The issue of abortion is much bigger then abortion. If the government can control what I as a women does w/my body - its a short jump for the govt controlling all our bodies - including our children. Keep in mind how we vote today effects us years from now and sets precendences that can be fought in the courts. Who is to say if they overturn roe v. wade that in 10 yrs they (govt) wont mandate we all give up a kidney whether we like it or not - or force people to have children and give them away. God bless us all... and god help us if mccain/palin win the election. I will be one of the hundreds/thousands heading north toward canada.

  • 121. BigSkyMum said:

    Amen, Nelson.

  • 122. Erin said:

    To anyone who doubts the president will have any impact on abortion policy in the U.S., let me remind you that the next president will most likely appoint one or two new justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. This could most definitely affect the outcome of an abortion case, including the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade.

  • 123. Anonymous said:

    I have been reading through the comments and seeing decisions based in fear. We are all forgetting that health care reform and abortion rights have been hashed back and forth for years now. I don't think in my lifetime that Roe v. Wade will ever be overturned. And as for the platform planks on healthcare... they are just that... planks, and don't mean that they will come into law just by our mere votes. They still have to go before the congress... and we need to be digigent with our elected officials and letting them know how we want them to vote in our interests. The older I get, the more I see that I needed to be more diligent in my younger years. I am a republican, but I don't vote party lines... I vote with as much education and information that I can glean from both sides. It's been a rough few weeks for me to sleep as I seek to find information that will guide me in making an informed choice when I do vote. I am a 2 time cancer survivor and also a woman who lost her uterus because of poor military medicine while trying to conceive. I have a lot to lose with both sides... but I know that I have to stay on task with my elected officials too.

  • 124. McCain't said:

    Government has no place in the issue of abortion- unless it is to regulate the sanitary conditions of the facilities or the necessary qualifications of the doctors. McCain is confused, dilusional, and frankly needs to bow down……Men have no concept of the emotional and physical trauma of abortion- the issue needs to be mute when it comes to presidentail debates and governmental discussions.

  • 125. Tanya said:

    102. Pixelfish said: while McCain and Palin talk about equal pay for women, McCain couldn't be bothered to vote on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

    ---

    Obama pays his female staff 83 cents compared to each dollar the men make. McCain pays women $1.04 to the men's dollar. (Source)

    Which one just talks about equal pay, and which one actually pays women more?

  • 126. Melinda said:

    But what about small business owners? I think YOU might be considered a small business owner with your little online empire here...or the REAL small business owners with overhead and employees and the like. Abortion and war aside, we have all learned in recent weeks that it's the economy that makes the country run, so by voting for your liberal values alone will KILL this country when small businesses begin closing left and right due to their struggle with obama's tax increases.

    it's easy to become utopian in an election year and forget the REALITY of how the world works...

    Just a thought...

  • 127. Cari O. said:

    Amen, Amen, Amen.

    I'll be interested in John McCain's opinion on abortion when he can have one.

  • 128. michelle said:

    I am glad to have stumbled upon this post today. Somehow, I missed the AIR QUOTES when I watched the debate yesterday on my DVR while running around after my two kids.
    What I'd heard was McCain throwing around the term "pro- abortion" which as I've felt for a long time is the ignorant umbrella that pro-lifers hold over pro-choicers. No one, let me reapeat, NO ONE is pro- abortion. Those of us who believe in Choice want women to have access to safe and legal procedures. Period.

    Before this debate, I was not planning on voting for McCain. Now, after seeing his performance, I am sickened by his total disregard for women's health and his belief that women and their doctors and families can't make up their own minds about this issue. He and Palin DO want to put women back in the dark ages and quite frankly, I've gone from simply not wanting to vote for him, to being quite afraid of him. It seems obvious that in his panic over poll numbers, he is showing his true colors...

    Thanks, Heather.

  • 129. andrea said:

    I for one am Pro-Choice. Would I ever get an abortion? No, probably not. But who the hell am I to tell someone else that they can't do so? Why should someone else's religious beliefs dictate what someone does with her body? What if the woman getting an abortion doesn't believe in the Christian God? I almost died giving birth because I had undetected eclampsia. I started seizing in the hospital and the doctor said had I not come to the ER when I did, both my baby and I would have certainly died. I wouldn't wish that upon my worst enemy. If early enough in the pregnancy, someone learns that it's their life or their baby's life, I wouldn't judge their decision to abort. I'd probably do the same thing.

    What ever happened to separation of church and state?

  • 130. Tanya said:

    122. Erin said: the next president will most likely appoint one or two new justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. This could most definitely affect the outcome of an abortion case, including the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade.

    --

    You think a pro-life Justice is going to be appointed, with a Democrat-majority congress. You're kidding, right?

  • 131. pixelfish said:

    Does anyone who breaks out the "Would you want your child to get an abortion without telling you?" argument think that holds water?

    If you don't want your pregnant daughter getting an abortion without telling you, don't treat women who get abortions like they did some thing wrong, and maybe your daughter would trust you if she got into that situation. Then you can discuss ALL the options together and let her make her decision knowing that she's had access to as much information as you can give her.

    But what the people who pose that question really mean is "Would you want your daughter to get an abortion?" Well, no, nobody should have to make that decision....but sometimes we do have to make that decision. And for those people, they would make that decision for their daughter.

    For those people I want to know, "Would you force your daughter to stay pregnant even though she doesn't want to be? Would you force your daughter to stay pregnant even though she is sick and terrified and oh, incidentally, having all kinds of social pressure because our society teaches us that girls who get pregnant need to be punished for their actions?"

    If your answer is "If I knew my daughter was pregnant, I would prevent her from getting an abortion if I could," there is no wonder that your daughters would fear telling you.

    Also, to paraphrase somebody else (I can recall who) just because you are somebody's parent doesn't give you the right to force your child to bear your grandchild.

  • 132. alikatze said:

    Hey, Dooce, I realize that certain Republican options aren't so hot this year, but, erm, I don't find Mr. Obama to be so hot, either. Honestly? The man's too new and has no "network" in Washington to shore him up; he's going to have to rob Peter to pay Paul just to get his nearest and dearest pet projects through Congress - even a Democratic one. As with Clinton, the GOP will dog Obama his entire presidency -- to appease them (because Barack is an appeaser, not a stand-your-ground type), he will easily give in and, like the current crop of Democrats in Congress, send important issues down the tubes. I don't have much faith in Mr. Obama to keep the GOP hands off things like Roe v. Wade.

    Thankfully, I live in Illinois (Chicago, to be exact), my vote is utterly useless thanks to the Obamabots here -- this means I can vote for exactly the party I want (no Al Gore or John Kerry because "the party needs me to" crap this time!). I will be voting Green all the way. If I'm feeling even more emboldened, I will write in Hillary Clinton. Yes, I'm a Hillary fan -- she, at least, has balls (or, should I say ovaries?...)

  • 133. katie said:

    a few quick things:

    partial birth abortion isn't even a medical term. it's a political one.

    and patrick, birth control fails. shit happens. get over it.

    jessica - if you developed pre-eclampsia at 20 weeks that would kill you AND your baby, you'd rather you BOTH die? i'm sorry, but that's insane.

  • 134. Elissa said:

    I don't understand. Is everyone seriously THAT retarded??? I don't think one person who commented so far actually a.) READ the blog entries that were posted or b.) COMPREHENDED what the discussion is actually about. America seriously lacks comprehension. So much so that it is fucking scary as shit. If you can't read an article and even grasp a minute concept from the piece, then are you REALLY an educated person? I don't care who you are, what you do, what kind of education and training you have. You are dumb as fuck if you seriously think that this whole conversation is about abortion. DUMB. AS. FUCK.

    This isn't about abortion. It isn't about pro-life or pro-choice. It isn't about anti-abortion or anti-choice. It's about McCain's idiotic representation of a WOMAN. His IDEAS of a WOMAN. And what he thinks about the well-being of a woman.
    Using the oh-so-popular "air quotes" to classify the HEALTH OF A WOMAN. So to say that the health of a woman is something to be rationalized. The well-being of a woman is something that should fall within certain boundaries. The LIFE of a WOMAN is something that needs to have rigid definition and should NOT be stretched to consider all situations.
    Are you a woman? Do you KNOW any women? Even just one woman, who you might remotely care about and might be willing to save her life? If so, THAT is why you should not vote for McCain. Not because he's going to make abortions illegal (it ain't gonna happen, it's just not). Not because he's pro-life (there's nothing wrong with being pro-life). But because, as a leader of this ENTIRE COUNTRY, he thinks that the HEALTH OF A WOMAN is something secondary.

    If after all of this, you're still going to vote for McCain, my heart weeps for you and any women in your life. I truly, deeply, feel very VERY sorry for you.

  • 135. Katie said:

    McCain never had my vote, but if he did, he would've surely lost it last night when he uttered the words; Pro-abortion. A man running for the President of this country should surely know the difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion. NO ONE is ever FOR abortion. EVER! It's a heart-wrenching decision that should be left up to the woman and her partner/family. Government should never, ever be involved.

  • 136. leftofemma said:

    I think that better access to contraceptives and education would help reduce the number of abortions in the country, but McCain would never go for that. Nor would his party.

    While I was bothered by the air quotes, I was also frustrated by the way he framed the issue. Obama talked about a woman talking to her family, physician, and those close to her to make an informed decision. McCain talked about some young woman who makes up some reason, presumably on a whim because that's how he thinks young women make decisions, to terminate a pregnancy.

    What McCain is forgetting is that some women who seek abortions are older, married women who already have children.

    The GOP regularly treats women as irrational, child-like beings who can't make decisions for themselves. It's insulting.

  • 137. Anonymous said:

    Regarding #19 Ann's statement:

    "When McCain gives birth through his penis, I will then be willing to listen to him about legislating MY UTERUS."

    Ann ~ it is not about your uterus, it is about the LIFE growing inside of it.

  • 138. RJ said:

    Right On-You are WRONG! Obama does support care of infants in failed abortions. If you watched the debate, he explained that he didn't not vote because their is ALREADY a law in the books that supports care of infants in failed abortion. There was no need for another LAW. This was a manipulation of the facts by MCCain

  • 139. April said:

    I am pro-life but I believe that overturning Roe v. Wade would be a disaster. I am aware that most will see that as a contradiction but it isn't. It's my belief that women have a responsibility to bring their child into the world and that abortion should never be used as birth control but I also strongly believe that the government should not dictate her choice especially using religion as the reasoning. I'm a fairly conservative Christian woman that will be voting for Obama because I don't believe that religious beliefs should affect our laws. I also think that anyone who is basing their vote on a single issue when our country is in ruins because of the policies of the last 8 years is dangerously ignorant.

    For those of you telling Heather to stop blogging politics please go look yourself in the mirror and repeat after me: The world does not revolve around me.

    This is her blog, her voice, her expression and she can say whatever she wants and if you enjoy it, then you can read it and if you don't then you have a choice to leave the page and yes, I'd be saying that even if I didn't agree with her opinions.

    Freedom is a beautiful thing that way.

  • 140. Anonymous said:

    Cari O--#127...So you only care about Palin's view? She is the only candidate of the 4 that can have an abortion. Good to know.

  • 141. Elisha said:

    I will absolutely be voting for John McCain. I am neither a republican nor a democrat, so I vote for who I think will do the best job and the person whose values and ideas I agree with. I do not like Barak Obama. I like John McCain. I like Joe Biden. I do not like Sarah Palin. I think John McCain would be doing much better in the polls if he had chosen a different running mate, but I will indeed vote for him and hope that Sarah Palin is as involved as Dick Cheney has been ;)

    Though your ranting and raving about politics bores me to death, I do still come here to see pictures of your dogs. I love them!

  • 142. Katie said:

    I love reading your blog Heather, and I will continue to read and enjoy it, but I definitely disagree on this issue.

    I got pregnant when I was 20 and chose not to abort my daughter, even though her birth would change my life irrevocably. I didn't have the money at the time to pay out of pocket my healthcare, so I went on medicaid. I stayed on medicaid for approximately two years, until I had a job and then did what was intended - I took myself, and my daughter...off medicaid. Actually, it was harder to get OFF medicaid than get on.

    So, yes, "a compassionate civil society" met mine and my daughters needs, and then when I was self-sufficent, I met those needs myself.

    Republicans do not believe that ALL welfare should be abandoned. What we DO believe in is individual responsibility and a "hand up" when needed.

    For myself, I'm voting for Mickey Mouse.

  • 143. Briana said:

    US politics are crazy. I'm in Canada and we've unfortunately gained another minority government with the Conservative party (what a waste of tax dollars - calling an early election to get practically the same results as before!). I had an argument with my mother over the phone about how I did not vote for the Conservatives, who do not support anything in my young, student life right now. I don't support any particular party - I think the most important thing to do is always look at the platforms and vote for what supports what you believe the best.

    PS - At least your controversies are exciting; do you know how boring it is to hear about how the prime minister is now wearing sweater vests to appeal to families? Blech!

  • 144. Sterling said:

    A legal expert I know has assured me that the idea of Roe v. Wade being overturned is preposterous, given the fact that our legal system relies on precedent. The idea generates lots of emotion, but it's a moot point. No voter needs to fear that.

    That said, I don't subscribe to the "abortion is OK no matter what" stance. Because in many instances there is NO DOUBT that what we are doing is killing babies. I'm not talking about cases where the mother's health is in danger. In such cases clearly a choice must be made, and it is a painful, difficult process for the mother involved. I'm talking about something else. In many states late-term, partial-birth abortions are legal. These kids - and they are kids - are the same congenital age I was when I was born two months prematurely, weighing only 3 pounds. Should another "fetus," at the same age and state of development that I was when I was born, be denied a chance to live? It isn't just about "legislating my own womb." The issue is much murkier than that. Apparently Obama believes this, too.

    It's a bit two-faced of us, as a society, to declare that these aren't children we're killing, when, should a pregnant woman be murdered, we charge the killer with TWO counts of murder, not one. Is a fetus a child only if the mother decides to keep it?

    Women today have many choices. Some would say the "right to choose" comes at the time of having sex: whether to have sex, whether to have it responsibly, and what form of birth control one prefers. As a society, if we emphasized those choices and did a better job of educating our young women and men about them, there might be less need for abortions, which, while necessary in some circumstances, are being increasingly used as a form of birth control.

  • 145. Jeppe said:

    Hi.

    Funny that the stupidest people usually leave their comments anonymously.

    The "I don't need your political views, just your photos of your dogs"-comments seem to be posted by people who just don't have a clue to what you and Jon essentially are about.

    I think I get a much fuller perspective of you from taking in all things and have them draw a much more detailed picture of you and your family. Old weird-ass-crazy-stuff mormon teenage diary included. It sets things in perspective, and tells a story of a human being who has done an uncanny good job of evolving, growing into a critical, humorous, loving person.

    From an international point of view, I cannot for the life of me comprehend that Republicans don't get how much damage they have done (largely through GWB in person) over the last 8 years, to destroy the mental image of USA as "the good guys". The scary thing is that USA has such a huge impact on the rest of the world that it really means the world -litterally- to us how you vote.

    Not just from a discussional perspective, but from a point of worrying about when WWIII will be kickstarted by some gun toading "either you're with us or against us" black/white world-thinking republican moron, voted into office, either by religious rightwinged rednecks or merely through the system of electoral college, which -surprise, surprise- IS NOT DEMOCRATIC. I am not sure how many americans know this. This fact also makes it even more ironic to listen to rightwinged Americans rave about how USA can tech democracy. You can't until you are truly living in a democracy yourselves.

    Don't be afraid of a President who is smarter than you. THAT IS A GOOD THING! Vote Obama.

    (And for those of you thinking "Mind your own business": Think about how you would feel if something I voted had a genuine impact on your life)

  • 146. Super Woman (Amy G.) said:

    I couldn't agree with those two women more.

    John McCain disgusts me with his ivory tower perspectives on the state of our country and what needs to be done to fix its problems, and I find his condescending smirks and remarks during every single debate infuriating enough to want to reach through my t.v. screen and slap him. His attitudes on abortion and his attacks on Obama for his votes on late-term abortion matters sent me into a fury. He's a raging idiot!

    McCain has NO CLUE what the average person in America is going through right now. He has NO CLUE what it's like to have ANY of his own rights taken away. And he has NO CLUE how to bring about the CHANGE that is desperately needed in this country. The idea of him in the Oval Office scares the living daylights out of me.

    Praying for a HUGE Obama win on election night,
    Super Woman in WI

  • 147. Anonymous said:

    Pro-choice = pro-abortion = pro killing babies. Deal with it

  • 148. SarahJ said:

    Absolutely agree with the post and with you posting it.

    I don't really understand why people get up in arms when you post something with regards to your political views.. this is a BLOG. Regardless of what readers think, blogs are about the individual views of the blogger. If they disagree they can either: a) not read it, b) read it and choose to learn something about people with differing views, or b) write their own blog.

  • 149. HouseofJules said:

    One more reason I'm not voting for McCain. I already knew his stance on abortion was the opposite of mine, but reading both of those snippets from other blogs made me shudder. Like another commenter wrote, he's seemingly a good enough MAN, but not the man I'd like to see as our president.
    Jules

  • 150. mrs b roth said:

    First off, I'm NOT voting for McCain because I DO support traditional family values - like not having affairs and leaving your wife and kids for a hot young heiress, and having a parent home to raise and supervise the kids. Doing what is best for the FAMILY.

    However, I do not agree that abortion is a right. It should always be an option when a woman's life is at risk or if her right to choose was denied at conception, but I will never understand why a woman can or should be able to choose to end a life she chose to start. The choosing time comes before the baby is made - this is NOT the 50's; women and men have unlimited access to contraception. We treat life and sex much too frivolously.

    Having watched the adoption process take place, I think every child is entitled to have a mom and dad who WANT to be a mom and dad and going through the pain and inconvenience of child birth beats the pants off ending a perfect potential person. Don't be a mom if you're not ready, but aborting for reasons of inconvenience or embarrassment are not sufficient.

    Sincerely,

    a blue dot in a red state.

  • 151. Emily said:

    147 - So since I had a growing pregnancy in my fallopian tube and I had it removed, did I kill my baby? Even knowing that as it continued to grow, my tube would have burst, at a minimum would have lost my tube, and I could have easily died?

  • 152. Shannon said:

    Both of those blogs were very well written and I could not agree with each of them more.

    I actually left a couple of comments on Julie's blog and I forwarded that entry to a few of people I know who are voting McCain. I was rewarded with several pictures of aborted fetuses for my troubles, with the idea that seeing what my vote for "baby killer Hussein" was going to cause. Apparently, showing photos of dead babies to a pregnant woman not even considering abortion is a "wake up call".

    There is so much ignorance. So much.

    Thank you for posting these, Heather. I think everyone should have to read these before they cast their votes this election.

  • 153. Anonymous said:

    #112 Unforunately, this is getting way off topic, but you can't insist that pro-lifers be called "ani-choice" any more than pro-lifers can call you "pro-abortion."

  • 154. andrea said:

    Thank you so much for sharing those posts. They moved me and reaffirmed my belief that abortion is a very private decision that needs to be protected.

  • 155. katie said:

    sterling, so my 'choice' to have sex with my husband while on the pill which ended in pregnancy somehow makes me uneducated? the sweeping generalizations are just staggering.

    i said it before, shit happens. even to educated, married adults. get over it.

  • 156. RJ said:

    Jill-I don't know if you are Christian or not, but your views on health care seem very Un-Christian to me.

    It kills me that the people who spout about what I should do with MY body, and whether or not consenting adults can be married-are the same people who don't think that we all bare responsibility for anyone else but ourselves. Is that Christian? Is that what Jesus was all about? I thought Jesus was about caring for those less fortunate, about NOT judging others . . . about Giving!

    I do think health care is a right.

    And if that doesn't convince you, I'll remind you that we all pay anyways. For all the preventive care that people without health care can't afford . . . guess who pays when they end up in the hospital? Oh, and I hope you and your parents never plan on using Medicare, right? That would be taking away from the taxpayers . . . guess you're on your own then too!

  • 157. Sandra said:

    Dear Jill comment #33 :

    I hope you get hit by a bus and then when you get all better you can comment on how much you don't support affordable health care and I hope your dead mother is proud of you.

    People like you make me physically ill and I pray to God you do not vote.

  • 158. Miriam said:

    I am so done with this.

    Can we just vote, already? I'm tired of being called a stupid religious wacko for having an opinion.

    I think it's a living thing and worth passing laws about. In fact, I'll even agree with you that those laws by nature are not going to be easy on the women they affect, but there is no way to mediate that result until we can just take out the embryo and let it gestate safely. From there we get into lots of debate and half of you have shut off reading this and hate me already, but I will not assume you are stupid or radical for your beliefs- how about showing the same courtesy to women with whom you all disagree?

    If I don't agree with medically optional abortions, am I then yours to vilify? Where's the all-important Tolerance let alone consideration of others? Where's the earnest debate?

    I can't believe I even bothered to read the comments or wrote one myself...

  • 159. Connie said:

    These posts are funny. Dems will always vote Dem because they want abortion available. Repubs will always vote Repub because they want to over turn abortion. A post here or there or any where isn't going to change anything. It just makes the ugly side of people come out

  • 160. Sweet Herald said:

    Ugh. Everything I read about that man makes me want to vomit all over my own tits.

  • 161. Kristy from Texas said:

    It fascinates me how close minded some people can be. I truly wonder if some of you aren't simply lurking on blogs to pick a fight with someone because you are so sure YOUR personal opinion is correct and the only "way to get to heaven".

    I am the mother of a beautiful 6 year old daughter and I have to tell you I would support her decision should she have the misfortune 10 years from now of falling in love and getting pregnant or should something as devastating as rape occur. It would be her decision! It should be her decision!

    For those of you who think women who have abortions take the easy way out... please that is it's own kind of hell. But again it is their decision!!!!

    I had a political science teacher say once... "you should never try to make a law out of a moral issue".

    Not going to church every Sunday may end up keeping me out of heaven (who know's) BUT IT IS MY DECISION!

  • 162. katie said:

    call me crazy, but i'm of the opinion that each and every woman who has had an abortion has her own story, her own reasons, and her own beliefs about their termination of pregnancy. putting all of them in a box labeled 'young, stupid, & irresponsbile' is dangerous. just like believing beyond a shadow of a doubt that roe v wade will never be overturned.

  • 163. Lauren Strange said:

    Do you ever get tired of ignorant people?
    I attempted to read all of the comments but I gave up.
    I understand being for McCain/Palin, that's cool and all, but to come on here and bitch about how they don't want to hear your political views blows my mind. I mean, this is YOUR site, YOU write what YOU want, and no one forced them to come here and read your "liberal" musings.
    I am definitely Obama/Biden. I wish it was Hillary, but alas, I have to go for the next best choice. I just think their policies are more suited to my tastes.

    I enjoy your work, no matter what it's about. Hell, I'd still read you even if you started kissing McCain's ass via the use of your words.
    :D

  • 164. Jason Trommetter said:

    Reading through this comment thread reinforces my view that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided.  Not because I think abortion should be illegal, but because it's not a federal issue. SCOTUS should never have take the case in the first place.  The decision to abort is way too personal and it's impossible for any law written at a national level to apply in every situation.

    Do I think taxpayers should pay for abortions? Hello No! But then I'm a Libertarian and I don't think the government should be in the health care business at all.

  • 165. Natalie said:

    Like everyone who was for slavery was free, everyone who is pro-abortion/pro-choice is born.

    This is NOT about woman's rights. This is about the rights of an unborn child. That baby doesn't get to say a single word about what happens to ITS body (which is distinct and separate from its mother's). And what about the man's rights in this situation? The baby has half of his DNA too, so don't kid yourself that this is nothing more than a woman's issue. It doesn't matter how you slice it, the baby is a human being (its unique DNA is determined immediately at conception) and it IS alive, as it meets the 5 qualifications for life (motion, reproduction, metabolism, growth, and stimulus response).
    So human life + abortion = murder.
    http://www.prolifephysicians.org/lifebegins.htm

    I disagree with you on a lot of things, dooce, and I let most of it roll off my back because I really appreciate your humorous insights into motherhood and life on this blog of yours; but this is ONE thing that I cannot keep silent about, and it sickens me to the core that people can genuinely believe that abortion is an okay "choice."

    There's nothing for me to reconsider here, dooce. Obama would never get the vote of a pro-life woman. Or any woman with morals, for that matter.

  • 166. Stacy said:

    I find it humorous that anyone things that there is that much difference in the candidates. Neither will do anything they said to get elected. They are all about personal power. Vote for whomever helps you sleep at night. Nothing will change one way or the other.

  • 167. Laura said:

    For pete's sake, as if Roe Vs. Wade will be overturned just because the evil John McCain gets elected. It takes a Senate a Congress and the Supreme Court to make a decision it is not based soley on the President. Once again, it is liberal propaganda trying to push their radical view points with scare tactics.

  • 168. Krissi thank you very much said:

    Far be it from any woman who calls themself a Christian to vote for John McCain who actually stands up for his beliefs. That would be wrong how Heather? Just because you have turned your back on the way in which you were raised, doesn't mean that those of us in middle, main stream American don't vote based on our convictions as well as our research. Killing innocent babies is WRONG!

    MCCAIN/PAILN will be getting my vote! You bet I will do my part to make sure Obama and his sorry politics won't be running this country for the next 4 years!

    Go ahead let the attacks fly, you guys can call me what you want all I am saying is that what ever you call me will NEVER make me change my mind on this election so you will be wasting your time and mine!!

  • 169. Anonymous said:

    Sandra @ 157 Wow. Did it make you feel better to say you hoped someone would get hit by a bus?

  • 170. megan said:

    #153: of course i can. a woman can be pro-choice without ever choosing to have an abortion, but you can't be pro-life without disagreeing with that woman's right to make that choice.

  • 171. Amy said:

    Call me a pessimist, but I don't see either political party ever making this issue any better. I appreciate compelling arguments from both sides and come to only one conclusion: we need to take better care of each other on an individual level. If you are worried about teenage pregnancies, why not volunteer or financially invest yourself in local youth? If you find it shocking that a dying woman would terminate her pregnancy, go hold her hand and watch as her body goes into multi-organ failure. I believe every choice a person makes affects someone else and no government will ever fully monitor them, for better or worse. This might not be near the issue it is if we simply cared about the people we see every day. The solution is individual, so before you rank or categorize the pain of nameless masses, for pete's sake, do one thing constructive in addition to voting.

    And to Heather, while I don't always share your views, I certainly appreciate your passion for a better world. Thanks for challenging me to do the same.

  • 172. abdpbt said:

    The posts you cited are fantastic. Thanks for spreading the word on them.

    Uggh, though, I don't know how you read some of this crap sometimes. I felt like strangling McCain the other day with his patronizing, smug, misogynistic frankenstein sneer, and my blood pressure is rising again after reading some of these people here, too.

    And as far as Palin goes, there is nothing that demonstrates McCain's misogyny MORE than his choice of her as running mate. Women should be embarrassed and insulted. You know, the thing is, we do need stupid people. They are super useful to society in a variety of ways. But one of their uses is not being a Vice President. Or talking about politics.

  • 173. Jackie said:

    Of course, sure, you can vote for Obama... when he and his lunatic wife not only support live-birth abortions, but petition for them. It's so much better for women to vote for him, and support his maniacal support of leaving living "aborted" children to die or actively slicing their jugulars so they bleed to death.

  • 174. Betsy said:

    It does take a lot of courage to keep an unwanted baby - just as it takes a lot of courage to make the hard decision to terminate. The crux of the matter is it's a personal decision and should continue to be. If we as women stood up and forced these candidates to stop blathering about things that shouldn't be an issue and actually address a few things that are REALLY wrong with this country, it wouldn't be such a hot button issue. They make this an issue and we let them. How do you plan on feeding hungry children? How do you plan on fixing our economic problems without bankrupting the middle class? How do you plan on giving us back our right to not be held without bail, and without representation? These are issues that don't get addressed because they're so busy diverting our attention with issues that should be between a woman, her partner and her doctor.

    www.survivallady.com

  • 175. BigT said:

    So, let me get this straight. The conservatives do NOT want to have the government involved in healthcare. But, they want to be involved in the decisions on pregnancy. Because one is a business issue, and the other is a moral issue. So, which is it? You can't have it both ways. If you are going to tell us that healthcare is OUR responsibility, then it IS our responsibility and you need to stay OUT of it. Do all you pro-life people support the war? Killing is killing. Right?

  • 176. Wendy said:

    While Palin was mayor, Wasilla County charged rape victims for their own rape exams (to collect DNA evidence). This practice was changed in 2005, when the United States Senate passed legislation requiring states to provide these exams free of charge. And the senator that sponsored this very woman friendly bill? Joe Biden. Barack Obama was one of 58 co-sponsors. John McCain was not. I'm not saying that Palin was the one the ordered the women to pay for the exams, only that she did nothing to change the practice in the town where she was mayor. From what I've read, Joe Biden has done much more for women's rights than Palin ever has. I am not naïve enough to believe that just because she has a uterus that she's on my side. Sarah Palin does not speak for me as a woman. And I trust her even less than I trust John McCain.

    The air quotes around health killed me too. The jerk.

  • 177. kaybee said:

    Sorry I just wanted to say that DAMMIT. You were in my hometown KC yesterday! I can't believe I didn't know. Such a bummer. I hope you enjoyed your time here and ate lots of bbq.

  • 178. Jo the plumber said:

    Heather, whatever will you do after the election to grovel for comments?

    Ever thought of actually doing something to help other people, like using this site for charity work?

    Let's see what controversy you'll drum up next Thursday or Friday (and the next, and the next,)to keep yourself in etsy shop junk and try to boost your sagging readership.

  • 179. momof4 said:

    Re:27 Sarah,

    A fetus is a baby worthy of healthcare and rights. It is no less a human than you are. That is why prenatal care is so important. Conception is the beginning of human life. Those 2 cells make 1 living human being. Murdering them out of convenience (which is most often the case) is wrong and sickening. If a man kills a pregnant woman, he is charged with a double murder... I wonder why that is? But yet the mother of that fetus can go to a clinic and have the same result, yet no consequences. It does not make sense to me. If you do not want the baby, there are millions of parents who do.

  • 180. Jenn Astle said:

    Um, to the previous commentator (Natalie),
    I beg to disagree with you, adamantly.

    It is a typical pro-life argument to immediately begin talking about morals. Whose morals, yours? Should I be bound by YOUR religious and moral beliefs even though I don't adhere to them....

    Last time I checked freedom of religion was included in the rights of American citizens, which means that your particularly Christian stance can not and should not be forced on to me and my personal choices.

    Hence, if you find abortion so appaling then perhaps you shouldn't have one and leave everyone else to decide where their own moral compass lies.

    Also, to imply that anyone who would vote for Obama doesn't have any morals, um excuse me but who the hell do you think you are to tell me I am immoral to choose a liberal candidate.

    Get your head out of your ass.

    (And read The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood...)

  • 181. April said:

    @ 165 Natalie "Obama would never get the vote of a pro-life woman. Or any woman with morals, for that matter."

    You have a mighty lofty opinion of yourself if you think your morals are the only right ones.

    Please find my comment above (139 I believe it was) where I stated very matter-of-factly that I am a pro-life, Christian woman who will be voting for Obama.

    Is this where you will personally condemn me to hell for that choice?

  • 182. Anonymous said:

    Abortion has been legal in this country since 1973 and it will stay legal. The right to choose is not going anywhere. And, even if it was to be overturned, it would take years to implement the changes. Voting should not be based on this issue alone. A president is unable to make such a drastic change to our rights just like that. The house and the senate are involved, not to mention all of the other red tape in place to keep ONE president from having absolute power. So, I guess I'm just not getting the point behind your post today. I'm tired of the feminism bs and I am a strong, independent female in my thirties.

    And, the same people who scream for tolerance are the EXACT same people who have no tolerance for opinions that are different from their own. I'm tired of the Christian bashing, the gay bashing, the republican bashing, the democratic bashing, etc., etc...I'm just plain sick of all the bashing. Where is the respect? Where is the acceptance? Where is the tolerance?

    Americans are spoiled and we forget how good we actually have it here. So, let's stop the bickering over values and beliefs and actually contribute something positive to our communities in order to make our society a nice place to live for EVERYONE.

    I am so going to celebrate when this election is over.

  • 183. Zachery Bir said:

    "And I find it interesting to note that his “compassion” for this newborn does not extend to guaranteeing it health insurance."

    This, to me, is one of the biggest underpinnings of the hypocrisy of the right. Compassionate Conservatism was, and is, a dangerously seductive lie.

  • 184. Ronna said:

    Hallelujah! Amen! GObama!

  • 185. Emily said:

    Dooce: we are all here because of your humor. Don't belittle us for it.

  • 186. Molly said:

    Thank you for the links - the stories were quite compelling. And thanks again for sharing your thoughts on this, despite the shitstorm in these comments. There are lots of us who don't comment often but love your views :)

  • 187. RJ said:

    Quote: "Of course, sure, you can vote for Obama... when he and his lunatic wife not only support live-birth abortions, but petition for them. It's so much better for women to vote for him, and support his maniacal support of leaving living "aborted" children to die or actively slicing their jugulars so they bleed to death."

    It's ok to have a different opinion, but what the HELL are you talking about?? You are spewing LIES. I want to know WHEN Obama "petitioned" for live-birth adoptions! Non-sense, he supports legislation to make them illegal with exception of the life and health of the mother.

    slicing their jugulars! You are a truly insane, hateful person. What doctors do you think do these procedures? Obama supports giving life-saving support to infants in failed abortions. He did not vote for a new law because there is already a law in place. Go back to your dark hateful hole!

  • 188. Elizabeth said:

    I am a woman and I am voting for John Mccain. I love our rights as American's to say what we want and I appreciate and value your thoughts and enthusiasm. However it is becoming less of and opinion and more of an insult. An insult to people that have read your website from its birth and have subsequently helped to pay your bills. Please keep this in mind before you begin to insult us which is the thin line you are beginning to step over.

  • 189. Katie said:

    All of these comments are such a great case study on moral relativism...

  • 190. JO said:

    JO:

    I am aware of why Obama didn't vote FOR that bill (because it didn't include an exception to protect the health of the mother.) What I'd like to know is why he didn't vote AGAINST it. He voted "Present." Were he truly passionately symathetic to the women Dooce cited, he would have voted with a resounding NO.

    There are various definitions of "late-term" but any leader -like Obama - who professes to support banning late-term abortions in ambiguous terms makes me nervous.

    As I said above, Obama is by far the better choice, but he is not fantastic by any means.

  • 191. Anonymous said:

    Commenter 178, are you new here? Heather could blog about air and people would comment. And funny that you should speak of sagging readership when you yourself are here reading as well as commenting...

  • 192. Bunny said:

    His stance on abortion is the main reason I AM voting for McCain and would never consider voting for Obama.

    I come from a long line of "inconvenient" pregnancies. One of my daughters got pregnant at 19. She married the father, and they are doing very well two years later. They just bought a house. My grandson is adorable. He's the best thing that ever happened to my daughter.

    To my fellow women-I think we can find a better way than to kill our own children in what should be the safest place they could be. I am so sorry that so many of you are so lacking in imagination to even consider alternatives to taking an unborn life.

    Every last one of us started with sperm and egg joining. Every last one of us has a right to grow, to develop, to LIVE.

    Having a baby is not an easy thing. For some it is much harder than others. But murder is not an answer. And all my middleaged friends who had abortions in the past can and will tell you just how very much they regret what they did.

    Don't you dare call McCain a jerk for wanting to protect innocents. I call him a hero.

  • 193. Jen said:

    Heather, I love this blog, I never skip a day but on this issue I have to respectfully disagree. This is one topic that makes me shake with anger. Abortion is murder of a child with no choice - why do you get to choose whether or not someone else can live or die?

    Rape and danger to a mother's life are exceptions, there are exceptions to every rule. I will grant you that.

    But abortion for any other reason is the most selfish act a person can commit. It makes me want to vomit. There are families out there who can take that baby off your hands if it is unwanted by you and love it as their own. Murder is not a choice, it's a crime.

  • 194. Anonymous said:

    I'm sorry - you didn't convince me - I'm much more afraid of a man with questionable associations, a record of not voting in the Senate, and if I were Jewish, I would be fearing for my life if Obama wins. I'm not saying that McCain is a great choice, I just don't think in this era of distrust of government, that we need a president with such a questionable past.

  • 195. Stacy said:

    Katie (189)--You are so right

  • 196. Anon said:

    Bunny - so McCain is all for protecting innocent fetuses, but doesn't give a shit about the kids dying in Iraq? Just wanted to get that clear, that only AMERICAN fetuses have a right to life.

  • 197. Jenn Astle said:

    192. Bunny

    If a doctor had told you that your daughter was going to DIE if she carried the fetus to term would you still have forced those ideologies on her.

    I wonder how much better off the child would be without a mother....

    Just a thought from the other extreme...

  • 198. Anonymous said:

    #170--Then Megan you don't have a full understanding about what pro-life is. It's not just about abortion, believe it or not. But you know, go ahead and re-label as you see fit.

  • 199. Anonymous said:

    McCain and Palin

    FTW!!! (for the win)

  • 200. sarah said:

    I am a woman and I'm also a woman who would vote for a giant squid named Jose and his army of Portuguese man-o-wars if it meant that I didn't have to listen to Obama tout about change with no real specifics, just saying change over and over again, or people talking about how Sarah Palin's going to be the death of our nation, or abortion rights for another four years after tomorrow.

    It seems that issues like abortion and a whole host of other issues will never really be solved and half the country will always disagree. I'm actually almost glad that you, Heather, have the energy to care so much about something you can't change. I mean, hey, you could use your blog to talk about things that matter and motivate people to get involved, but really it seems like you're more interested in alienating any of your readers who might be republicans, or against abortion, or hey, just women who don't agree with you.

    I was undecided, I was planning not to vote at all, but now, because I'm so insulted by this, I think I'll vote for McCain.

  • 201. Anonymous said:

    Bunny, to build on what Jenn Astle said, doesn't a mother have a responsibility to her other children? To her husband? If she dies because she was not allowed to have a late-term abortion for medical reasons, what happens to her survivors?

  • 202. Cait said:

    I've never ever posted anything on any blog - I prefer reading what everybody else has to say and making snarky comments about it to my coworkers :0)- but after seeing that clip, I just can't help myself.

    Since when is health something you air quote? I'm 10 weeks pregnant and am so excited for my future bundle of joy...but the thought of some other person making my decision between my life or my baby's? Horrifying...

  • 203. Jordan said:

    Honestly, pro-choice or pro-life, the real question is do you really want the most vital issues of the health of you and your unborn child to be strung up in bureaucratic red tape and government regulations? I think it's inane to believe that a large, distant government can make the correct and necessary choices for the health of individuals.

  • 204. Connie said:

    Sarah #200 I think that might be Dooce's secret plan. I think she does more to help McCain then she realizes

  • 205. Jennifer Suarez said:

    I'm voting for myself because I agree with all of my own opinions. It's so much simpler that way. ;-)

    No, but seriously - there will never be a candidate that we will agree with 100% on all points, all issues, all views. But we do our best to pick the one that is a closest match to our own ideals.

    Personally I'll be voting for Obama. I feel that he will become president, but that some people in this country will not be able to handle it and one of those crazy people will assassinate him. Just look at the strong opinions in the comments reflected on this blog - imagine how some of these people would act if he actually becomes president. One of them could snap - they already are close to a breaking point even at the mere prospect of the whole thing.

    I am saddened that we are still dealing with so much hate and lack of respect for others in our country.

  • 206. Anonymous said:

    #185-Emily
    Please don't speak for me. Thanks.

  • 207. amy said:

    Abortin = MURDER. The End.

    And yes, this is coming from a person with a uterus.

  • 208. Joanna said:

    Safe and legal abortion is already very difficult to get in this country in many states. In countries where abortion is illegal even to protect the health and life of the mother WOMEN DIE. They die both from the dirty, amateur illegal procedures they seek out of desperation, and they die because doctors and hospitals refuse to treat them for the dangerous complications that can occur even in wanted pregnancies. Yes, it can and does happen that a wanted pregnancy can go wrong and a woman is faced with a devastating choice. I know a woman who had to choose if she wanted to carry a dead fetus to term and then give birth, or have the pregnancy terminated (technically an abortion) because of "fetal demise"-her baby had died in the womb. What a hideous "choice" to have to make. Should the government have forced one choice on her rather than another, even if it meant she might die as well?

  • 209. Emma said:

    I am pro-choice and voting for Obama but I find it annoying when abortion, an issue about which it's nearly impossible to change anyone's mind, becomes a lynchpin in elections. I sometimes think the abortion war is a colossal waste of resources. We're not winning anyone over to our side. Hopefully someone can change my mind about this.

    All that being said, I do fear the damage that the McCain/Palin administration would do to reproductive rights. It's a niche battleground, but one that matters.

  • 210. Kate said:

    The fact that there are actually women out there who are eager to vote for McCain makes me TERRIFIED. The fact that there are so many people in this country who would like to shove their religion down everyone else's throats with nary a thought towards the principles and reasons for why this country was founded in the first place scares me. How are we better than the countries who tyrannically squash the freedom of practicing a religion other than the government's religion? We are simply taking the "legal" tactic of changing the laws to suit one religion's needs and ignoring the fact that there are so many others here who may not have the same God. Or any God! But they have "family values" and "morals" on their side so they must be right.

    GET YOUR RELIGION AWAY FROM MY BODY AND OUT OF MY MARRIAGE!!

  • 211. sue said:

    I am voting for McCain. I am pro-life. I do not believe the government should HAVE to be involved in a woman's life. It's unfortunate that people think having an abortion is just another birth control option. Unborn children need to be protected, just as much as all of the other causes that are so passionately touted.

  • 212. Jill said:

    Read the book Protect and Defend. It deals with a teen who is pregnant and her parents are uber conservative and religous and refuse to let her have an abortion dispite the fact that the baby will not live once born and it could possibly harm or kill the mother birthing this child. In the least, leaving her infertile.
    Such a good good good book and it shows both sides of the story...
    Everyone should read it before the election...!!!!

    Also - this blog makes some good points
    http://accidentalhousewife1.blogspot.com/2008/09/when-abortion-is-illega...

  • 213. April said:

    @ 200 Sarah - If you think all Obama ever says is Change w/o giving specifics then you really should pay more attention. You are choosing to be ignorant if you don't know what he stands for.

    And outside of voting over a single issue, voting just to spite someone because you're sick of their opinion is just about the most dangerously ignorant thing any American can do.

    Educate yourself, then vote.

  • 214. Connie said:

    210--You're right. This is about religion...the Democratic Religion. And The One will tell you how to think. Don't believe for a moment that the Republicans are the only religious ones here. The Democrats just don't have church buildings. Or maybe they do--they are called Courts

  • 215. Wendy said:

    BTW, if any of you hear anything that sounds completely insane (like that Barack wants to kill babies or that Michelle hates white people) check out www.fightthesmears.com. Maybe consider this common sense thought... if these things were really true, do you not think that maybe McCain would bring it up? (Because he tried to pin Ayers on Obama in the debate and we all saw how poorly that worked. You know, since it's not true.)

    As a patriotic citizen you gotta be willing to pay attention long enough to get the whole story. Not just sound bites and certainly, for the love of God, don't get your info from forwarded emails. If you're willing to believe that Microsoft will give you 20 cents for every person that you forward an email to, then you probably ought to put a bit more effort into finding out the facts about the people running for president. Please, for the future of our country?

  • 216. Anonymous said:

    Something missing from many people who advocate for McCain's stance. The posts that Heather offered were in reference to ending late-term pregnancies because of dire health concerns.

    First, the act of ending a late-term pregnancy makes up something like less than 1% of abortions. I cannot imagine the heartache and compassion it must take for a mother to choose between her life and her unborn son or daughter. However, due to a myriad of complications and unfortunate circumstances, it happens.

    This is not about changing your mind or not wanting to care for a special needs child. It is not about being irresponsible or forgetting to make an appointment. Ending a late-term pregnancy because of health reasons means there is no right decision, there is no good decision. Nothing comes out the way it was supposed to.

    The circumstance that John McCain so carelessly referred to is enormous, epic and has no good alternative. No mother deserves to have to make the choice, let alone having her decision questioned and mocked by a presidential candidate.

    I was never going to vote for John McCain and this is only one of a thousand reasons why I will cast my vote for Barack Obama. Thank you for writing about this Heather - for bringing it to all of our attention.

  • 217. Pauline said:

    If anyone here doesn't understand why a women would need to terminate a pregnancy after the first trimester, read this article and imagine yourself in this woman's (and her husband's) shoes:

    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/01/25/my_late_te...

    NO ONE ever "wants" to have an abortion. NO ONE is pro-abortion. Ever. Period.

    NO ONE says or thinks this is an easy decision to make. The fact that I'm voting for Obama means I value the ability to make that choice for myself, and not have anyone else make it for me.

  • 218. Di said:

    For the life of me.... I will never understand why Republicans feel it is so necessary to control our wombs. This issue just goes on and on and on. Just let every woman make their own choice and get over it GOP. My womb does not even work anymore, it's broke and I'm glad, but even in it's prime it did not belong to you. I'm just damn glad that I had a choice when I wanted and needed a choice, and I wish the same for my granddaughters and great-granddaughters because women that want an abortion will ALWAYS find a way to seek it out whether legal or not, so let's keep abortions safe.

  • 219. Heather said:

    This may be off topic, but I've noticed that many people who are "pro-life" are also "pro-death penalty" and/or "pro-war." I don't get that.

    Think about this this, too... a true Republican would not want government telling women what they can and can't do with their bodies. They are supposed to be for less government. It's unfortunate that the radical fundamentalist "Christians" (who behave in a way that would make Jesus cringe) have taken such a big role in the Republican party.

    Anyway, if you listen to what Obama says, he is not pro-abortion. No one is.

  • 220. Amy J. said:

    Heather,

    I am not a woman who only thinks in terms of her reproductive capability. I don't walk around thinking via my uterus and wouldn't ever elect or not elect a president just because of this one issue. It always comes back to this one issue for liberals. Why is that? I would really like to know. It's gay rights and abortion. That's all I hear over and over. Are these two issues really THE only ones that make you hate Republicans? Because I'm voting Republican and am not considering them much at all.

    I am pro-choice. But I am a mother, so I can see very much how abortion is horrible as an option. I could get into all the things I think about abortion and adoption and all that. But I truly don't see the point.

    What I don't feel is that Roe v. Wade is in danger. Every election cycle we hear the liberal left go apeshit over Roe v. Wade being overturned. Every election. Again, I point out that Roe v. Wade has SURVIVED Republican presidents Nixon (president during it's passage), Ford, Reagan (two terms), Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. (two terms). So basically for the 35 years since it's been on the books, there has been a Republican in office 24 of those years. Wow, look...it's still here. Abortion is still legal. Huh...I thought it was in danger from all those horrible Republicans!?

    I think if Roe v. Wade can manage to stick around with that much Republican, pro-life "power", it's pretty safe. Just because someone says they are pro-life doesn't mean they will overturn Roe v. Wade. Remember, people in this unraveling democracy still have a right to their views (at least until we become totalitarian). McCain is pro-life. So. Palin is pro-life. So. Neither has really done much in the way of stopping abortion in terms of laws or legislation. So why are you so incredibly scared? Just because they utter the words "right to life"?

    All I know is that it's not a Democrat campaign unless the abortion ban hysteria is brought to the table. We must be nearing election day.

    I'm not worried. I don't know many women who are. It's semantics. And I'm appalled at how you call out for women to be worried about their reproductive rights but talk about Sarah Palin like she's worse than the shit your dog eats. You should be ashamed.

  • 221. Jeppe said:

    @178.

    HAHAHAHAHAHA, yeah coz' THAT'S something Heather should worry about. Man, could you be any more stupid?
    She has one of the most widely read blogs in the world. She has had that for years. A long time before this election and she will continue to have so for a long time after this election. Tough luck, stupid.

    --
    "Guns don't kill people; people kill people...but monkeys do too, if the've got a gun"

    -Eddi Izzard

  • 222. Sadie said:

    AMEN to #134, Elissa.

    This is not about a single issue - this is not about pro-choice vs. pro-life - this is about a candidate for the most powerful office in the Western world who believes that women do not matter. This is about a man, with a wife and daughters, who makes it clear in word and deed that he thinks women are secondary.

    THAT is why ALL WOMEN, regardless of opinion on abortion rights, should not vote for John McCain.

  • 223. Sarah said:

    You just made me want to vote for McCain even more - is that what you are trying to do, because you are pretty good at getting out the "anti-Dooce" vote!

  • 224. right on elizabeth said:

    #89, elizabeth - well put. seems every post here lately talks about mccain/palins's evil, but never mentions obama's side of the same issue. where's the open mindedness?

  • 225. Anonymous said:

    Once upon a time people fled from Europe to America for a better life in the“Land of the of the Free” but now this country seems to be full of mind restricted people who seriously intend to use their right to vote to limit their own people’s freedom. How dare you use a democratic vote to restrict other people’s choices. What’s next? Suggest that women better wear a chador as otherwise it’s their own fault if being raped and becoming pregnant? What on earth is wrong with you Americans.

  • 226. Ali said:

    Sue #211, I think you didn't read the Flotsam or A Little Pregnant posts. Either that or you did read them, and didn't pay a jot of attention.

    Both those posts highlight the heartbreaking cases of pregnancy that cannot be saved - when a mother's life still can. How is it "protecting life" if one is willing to let the mother die along with the fetus? Re-read the Flotsam post, and try to put yourself in her and her husband's shoes.

  • 227. Carrie said:

    First off, let me say ditto to commenter #26, 31 & 58.

    Second, I was brought to tears after reading each and every comment here, adding them to all the rhetoric, banter, comments, ignorance, screaming and yelling I've been hearing throughout this political process and really struggling to wrap my head around what this means less importantly for our country's politics, but for decency, humanity, civility amd compassion toward each other as human beings.

    The fact that politics can drive everyday folks to be mean, hurtful, inconsiderate, full of rage, hate or fear just boggles my mind. Well, really it shouldn't, because it seems that even something as insignificant as someone driving too slow in front of someone can cause a deadly rage these days.

    What happened to taking a step back and thinking before speaking, to first and foremost (before class, religious, political alignment) being kind and compassionate, to caring about about other people or to giving of ourselves without expecting anything in return? What happened to wanting to be a caring and contributing (and I'm not talking about paying taxes) citizen of a greater community rather than interested in only looking out for number one?

    What I'm worried more about is the state of our humanity. The apparent culture that is breeding in this country has us on a slippery slope toward even more increasing hostility (although often times it's almost impossible to imagine it could be worse), and lack of compassion (what I currently feel may be the primary ill of our society).

    No matter who will get your vote come this November, couldn't we all stand to take a step back and look at each other through the eyes of compassion first and foremost instead of through ideological glasses made from religious or political alignment?

  • 228. shodna said:

    I have to vote for John because I'm a woman and he has a vagina on his ticket.

  • 229. Kristina said:

    I've said it once, and I'll say it again: a woman voting for McCain is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders.

  • 230. CaptainUnderpants said:

    Pro-choice is NOT necessarily anti-life. Pro-choice means one gets to choose for oneself and NOT have someone else choose for them. Pro-lifers want people to have no choice. So, they want to take away our freedom to choose. Isn't that what we fight for? Freedom? You all jump up and down and wave flags and spout off about our FREEDOM, and then you want to take one away. Contradictions abound. God forbid the liberals want to take away one - like private healthcare. Then they get labeled socialists and communists.

  • 231. Sue said:

    Dooce, I love your site, even when you're talking politics I don't agree with. But this time I have to speak up. I think it's irresponsible of you to encourage your readers to reconsider their vote over one issue. At a time when we are in economic crisis, when we are at war, when people need affordable access to health care, making a voting decision based on one issue (one, by the way, that has survived several Republican administrations with Presidents more activist on this issue than McCain). People need to be educated about ALL of the issues in order to make a choice.

    I am a pro-choice Republican (we do exist) and I have been part of many commitees, organizations, and even just at my book club, discussing the Health of the Mother issue. What Mr. McCain was talking about in terms of women who 'use health as an excuse' is a debate that is alive and well, and keeps many Republicans from voting for the issue because it leaves the door open for activist doctors to buck the system by falsifying or exaggerating symptoms to fit this qualification. Though it was poorly presented at the debate, it is an issue that legislators on both sides of the issue attempt to sort out - language without loophole. Like it or not, it's the system.

    Anyway, I'm not trying to be on a soapbox. Normally I don't mind when we disagree - but this time, I think that the advice to make a one issue decision was bad.

  • 232. Sterling said:

    Katie, #155.
    I never said you were uneducated. You should read my post a little closer. I said we, as a society, need to do a better job of educating our young women and men about the choices they make re: sex and birth control.
    I'm guessing you would agree with me that the 14-year-olds who are getting pregnant are not exactly doing so with a wealth of information and support at their fingertips. I'm guessing you would support providing those young women with a form of birth control that is easy for them to use and won't cause any health issues. I'm also guessing that you would support educating these young women about sex before they ever get into a situation where they have to choose. Knowledge is power, and our young women and men have far too little of it. If they had more, there would be fewer decisions to be made with respect to abortion. I am not opposed to abortion across the board, but it should not be used as a form of birth control.
    The knee-jerk reactions to McCain - and by the way I have already voted for Obama - on this blog prove that liberals are no more tolerant of opinions that differ from theirs than are the neocons they so openly loathe for doing the same thing. We have to get over this "I'm right and you're dead wrong" attitude, or our country will spiral downhill so fast there won't be any United States by the time our children grow up. It's time to put aside the partisanship and work together. Maybe we can't all get everything we want, but surely there's a way for both parties to work together.

  • 233. Nikki said:

    I think it's very telling when all these people think it's well within their rights to spew their fundamentalist bullshit onto everyone else, but that liberals need to mind their own business as it were. also, would they feel the same if the government were regulating who was ALLOWED to have children? What if they decided one day that only people who made a certain amount of money could have/keep children? Or a certain age group? Racial demographic? Reproductive rights are NOT only about abortion, Pro-choice is just that--CHOICE. And when you advocate taking away someone else's choice, you are one step closer to giving people the right to take away yours.

    BTW when someone writes something on their PERSONAL weblog, it is your CHOICE whether or not you read it, and whether or not you continue to read it. If it offends your overly-religious-eyes, then don't. Very Simple.

  • 234. Tim said:

    Based on their long and illustrious track record, the right seems to really care about the life of a child until, you know, it's actually born. Apparently, once a kid crosses the "finish line" out of the womb, it's got nothing more to worry about. I'd be a little less suspicious what truly drives a lot of pro-lifers if they followed through on the pro-life attitude once the child left the delivery room.

  • 235. Rocky said:

    Someone needs to post a clip from Idiocracy right about here...

  • 236. Hollie said:

    I'm actually more scared of Obama's plans to "redistribute the wealth". THAT's what will hurt me and my husband. We've worked too hard to get where we are just to have increased taxes reduce my husband's business income for the benefit of those who don't hold down jobs. They didn't work from 9AM until 3AM for three years for my husband's money.

    McCain's views on abortion will probably not make much difference, since the house and senate are democratically heavy.

  • 237. Lauren said:

    I think this is worth reading too:

    http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000008450.cfm

  • 238. Anonymous said:

    I mainly want the Republicans to win just to hear all the members of the Sky Is Falling Party piss and moan about the world ending. It would be worth it just for that

  • 239. Jack said:

    Sorry Dooce...some people cannot stand an idea that's not their own nor someone who has differing opinions. I love when you write on hot topics but dislike your "readers" hate spew afterward. After all, it is YOUR blog...written for us...love it or leave it eh? Oh, btw...don't get confused bout my name folks...I am female...and would have an abortion in a heartbeat though lucky for me, gay people can't procreate no matter how hard I try, hahaha! And, I live in the south and see so many poor children living in poverty and pain with families that don't give two s*&%# about them....but sure wouldn't abort cause that's not what the lord wants...and I don't see any of you "good families" pounding down the doors of adoption agencies. Just one visit to a laundry mat here is Arkansas should change anyone's mind about abortion...these poor children being abused, malnourished, and put on the back burner so mommy and daddy can sip cans of high life, read people magazine, and smoke cigs with their last pennies....really F'in tragic. It's all talk with no follow through in the republican world. They really don't care about anyone who is not like them.

  • 240. Kris said:

    I hate politics. It makes everyone crazier than rabid bats. Personally, I do not believe either "Obiden" or McCalin" are gods reincarnate, their policies sound, nor do I believe they will do anything for this country regardless of your stance on abortion. I can't say this is one of your more stellar posts Dooce. And NO I didn't read the links in their entirety because I felt they were very biased so if that makes me look stupid so be it...thanks for pointing it out repeatedly.

  • 241. Christine said:

    Thank you Heather for posting the links. I've linked from my facebook.

    BUT GOD!!! (This deserves 3 exclamation points.)

    134. Elissa said what I'm thinking it the best.

    You people don't even know what this post is about! Go back to the links and READ.

    Sheesh.

  • 242. geminijen said:

    All I know is that I voted today!!!! Yee Haw!

    Obama/Biden '08!!

  • 243. J. Howard said:

    McCain and Palin are not pro-life. They're pro-birth. If they were pro-life, he wouldn't be making jokes about bombing Iran, or putting air quotes around "health of the mother" and she wouldn't be shooting animals from planes for the fun of it, or ignoring the people at her rallies who are shouting "Kill him" when she mentions Obama's name.

    Obama said it best the other night, although I thought he could have been more forceful. NO ONE is pro-abortion. This is a matter of who gets to decide. Why is it that the people who refer to Medicare and Medicaid as Socialist programs are the same people who want the government telling us whether we can give birth and whom we can marry? Give me a break.

    Dooce, I'm sure I don't have to tell you this, but it's worth reminding some of your readers that this is YOUR blog. Write what you want. If people can't handle your politics, they can always let Fox News do their thinking for them. Come to think of it, some of them clearly already do.

  • 244. Ames said:

    Ok. There's no middle of the road on this issue. You are either for abortion or you are against it. I for one am against it in any circumstance. I think this is what McCain was trying to get across. That Obama said he was against it in certain circumstances, BUT....

    There is no 'but' on this issue. You are either for it or against it. End of story.

  • 245. Andra said:

    To everyone hates it when Heather heavily featuring politics and this election in her blog, and feel the need to comment about it:

    This blog chronicles her life, her perspective, what she thinks about and cares about and is passionate about.

    I don't know about you all, but my life and my perspective, what I think and care and am passionate about at this point in time are heavily entrenched in politics. In fact, the vast majority of people who I surround myself with and interact with on a daily/weekly/monthly basis are extremely interested in the politics and future of this country. I'm just a lowly college graduate, eeking out a living while trying to get some work experiences for something bigger and better.

    So, it stands to reason that if Heather, as a professional blogger, feels even half as strongly as I do about the direction the country I live in is heading, some/most/ALL of her posts are going to involve politics.

    My point? Come back November 5th. Or just leave.

    Dooce won't mind, I promise.

  • 246. Diana said:

    Oh yes, things presidential candidates say to hold on to votes...careless words on a topic that has become a battle of principles instead of a thoughtful process on how to deal with a difficult reality.
    Unless, of course, you want desperate people to turn to charlatans, get into prison or die. Abortion is not going to go away. Ever. So be practical about it instead of all pro-lifed up and get a frame of rules in place that does justice to the different reasons and non-reasons for abortion.

    I just have to put a remark in here concerning the "capitalist fire" mentioned in one of the comments above. Seems to me that fire has burnt up its own oxygen, with its relentless focus on growth and profit no matter what. It might not be bad to modify good old capitalism a bit, before we all go up in smoke...

  • 247. Leslie said:

    It's HEATHER'S blog, she can write whatever the fuck she wants!!!!!

    I get so mad at everyone who says, "I love your writing Heather but cut the politics bullshit." IT'S HER BLOG! If you don't like it, don't bother reading and why the hell take the time to comment?!

    Geez people. Let it go. NOT YOUR BLOG.

  • 248. Katie said:

    Wow, I just read #54, Patrick (who I assume is a man). He says:

    "There is nothing innocent about "forgetting" to use a condom and winding up pregnant. Rape is another thing. For crying out loud people...live with your choices, mistake or not."

    It's exactly this kind of arrogance and ignorance that is fueling John McCain's campaign. Thank you for demonstrating that, Patrick. Did you notice, ladies, how kind Patrick was in throwing us this little bone about how "rape is another thing". Whew, good thing Patrick is here to tell us all that.

    So, when women desperatly want to become pregnant and then get the horrifying news that they have cervical cancer and need chemotherapy, I guess becoming pregnant is just a choice they will have to live with, even if it kills them and their baby too, right Patrick?

    Or when a TEN year old comes to the hospital to deliver her SECOND child fathered by her uncle, I guess she'd just better own up to her decisions and face the music, eh Patrick?

    Thanks for using your platform to speak out for women's rights, Dooce. I'm sure you get lots of hate mail because of it, but when the conversation dies, so do our rights.

  • 249. Julia said:

    Hey! You read the same blogs I read!

    Completely agree here. I sent a link to Alexa's post to just about everyone I know.

  • 250. Shannon said:

    UGH Some of these comments are making me want to pull all my hair out. This is not about whether or not abortion should be legal period, it's about abortion being legal if its the ONLY OPTION FOR THE MOTHER TO LIVE! McCain is pretending like this situation never happens.

    Dooce, I guess you should have just posted the entire articles here because it's obviously too much effort to click a stupid link.

  • 251. Leslie said:

    Ok, Andra was much more eloquent than myself. Thank you Andra. :)

  • 252. Erin said:

    Thanks for the links - interesting reading, esp. since I missed that part of the debate the other night.

    I'm a Christian independent and happen to be pro-life, but I could never be a one-issue voter, and I'll be voting for Obama this year, for his stance on many other issues and just the way he presents himself. The way that he carries himself in these debates, the way that he's able to be diplomatic (when McCain is visibly seething with anger) - that's what I want in a president who will face countless tougher meetings over the course of 4 years.

    Anyway, maybe my memory of civics class is really bad, but I have a hard time believing that a case similar to Roe v. Wade will ever again come before the Supreme Court, and if it did, that it would be overturned. Maybe that's naive, but I don't understand that line of thinking from the pro-life camp, that McCain (or another republican candidate = overturning RvW). And if it were to be over-turned, wouldn't the law then revert back to each state anyway?

    And honestly, it's been said above, but I believe overturning it, regardless of the reasons, would create a public health disaster in this country. It would certainly not stop all abortions from happening, and it would make those that happened unsafe. I envision something similar to Prohibition, in that society will not accept the repealing of a law like that.

    Again, I'm pro-life in the sense that I do believe that life begins at conception, but I don't really believe that means I should use political means to dictate others' actions in regards to abortion. I wish pro-lifers could focus more energy on, say, adoption rather than to believing that some political figure will someday be a cure-all for all their beliefs. There are upwards of 2 million orphans worldwide, and I'd love it if we could focus on making adoption easier and cheaper - that we would work on building a 'compassionate civil society' - I'm not sure that we have one now.

  • 253. Rocky said:

    PS Thanks for reminding me to vote - card's been sitting on my kitchen counter for a week.

    Obama/Biden 08

  • 254. Anonymous said:

    "I don't like the idea of abortion, but you cannot legislate morality."

    It really bugs me when people say this. Remind me again why murder is illegal...

  • 255. Katie said:

    Thank you for the links (I read them and the link provided by the other commenter). As much I hate the idea of babies dying in any way (medical issues or unwanted), I know there will be always be a need for medical abortions. That said, I still consider myself pro-life. Pro-mother's life and baby. Heck I'm even against the death penalty.

    To your blog topic at hand, McCain made a stupid comment and an inappropriate gesture (the air quotes). I sincerely doubt he values women's health any less than a man's health. He has a wife, mom, and daughters, he is not going to deny them health care. And if he truly did wish second rate health care for women, I'd be up in arms about it as well. He doesn't.

    I'm a woman and I'm voting for McCain.

    Can we please discuss how Obama wants to tax small business so he can "spread the wealth around” because “it’s good for everybody.” (See Joe the Plumber.) Roe v. Wade is not going anywhere no matter who is elected but I'm afraid business will be exiting the US even faster to overseas if Obama has his way.

  • 256. Jo the plumber said:

    Sue in 231, see #178

    All Heather cares about is pageviews. Period. Most of us know that but stay tuned for the genuine posts.

    Oh, and etsy. She cares about etsy.

    Oh, and talking about style instead of actually having some of her own.

  • 257. Anonymous said:

    @254--so right. All our laws (for the most part) are legislated morality. Just ones most of us agree on

  • 258. Sweet Herald said:

    I hope not, Sarah, you're educating my ass that's for sure.

    Comment 33 made my mouth drop.

    Comment 101 made me roll my eyes. So do you consider the pill killing a baby then?

  • 259. Alabama Jo said:

    I would like to say that I am a faithful follower of Christ and someone who has prayed over this election for the last year...and I'll be voting for the Obama/Biden ticket.

    While I am against abortion, I also understand the necessity behind keeping it legal on some levels. Moreover, as Obama said in the Saddleback Forum, I disagree with it morally but understand that not everyone has the same morals I do.

    I am voting on more important issues, such as the economy, the war in Iraq, and especially education. It is time for change in this country, and Roe v. Wade won't be changing anytime soon, even with the appointment of new justices. We need to vote on the issues that MUST change, not the "hot-button" topics that everyone thinks they're so educated about.

    Just my two cents.

  • 260. Kim said:

    I find it ironic that a woman would choose her own life over her child's during pregnancy/at birth in a situation where only one could be saved... and yet if she were standing in a bank with her toddler during a stand up, you would never see her hold the child up in front of her to catch a bullet headed in her direction, or maybe you would. :(

  • 261. Anonymous said:

    For all the people who are basing their vote on the single issue of abortion, please consider that anti-abortion Bush was president for 8 years. He didn't succeed in overturning Row Vs. Wade. He did however, start an unjustified war and topple not only the economy of the United States but destabilize the economy of the entire world.

    Over turning abortion rights which have been legal in the United States for over thirty years would be next to impossible (even for Palin). There are many safeguards on human rights in place in the court and constitution.

    Although many Americans are passionate about abolishing women's right too choose I urge them to consider all of the issues that the President will be responsible for and actually think about who would be a better overall leader for the American People.

  • 262. Hollie said:

    Amy J - #220 - you are completely correct - anyone making a stink out of this issue - one that is on the back burner for politicians, is grasping at straws for something to argue over.

    I am pro-choice. I am not worried about losing this choice. There are many MORE important issues we should all be focused on. I am an educated woman scared of all those NOT voting for McCain. Obama will probably make most of us poorer, which should be a concern. He does speak smoothly, I will admit, but if you listen carefully, he doesn't say that much. He has general ideas, yet few detailed plans. Why aren't the Obama fans noticing this?

  • 263. jlws said:

    I'm not going to base my vote on an issue that was put to bed 35 years ago, before I was even born.

  • 264. Sweet Herald said:

    Oh and comment 147 made me laugh. How fucking stupid.

  • 265. Kristan said:

    I wasn't going to comment on this post, for a number of reasons, but then I saw this video and wanted to share it with you.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v77WekmM8F8

    Wow.

    Although I suppose it's good that she wouldn't want them jailed...

  • 266. Emily said:

    #206: Really? Just here for the political posts? Never read the other posts? The Leta letters? The Chuck pics? Okay then. Sorry. And my post said nothing that she shouldn't post her beliefs. Just that dooce responded something earlier that I felt belittled me as to why I come to her site...which is because I like her humor.

    So many angry haters here. Yikes.

  • 267. Teenie said:

    To the one who commented that health-care is a privilege, not a right:

    I was hospitalized eons ago for an allergic reaction. I stayed overnight, had tons of x-rays, Benadryl shots, you name it. I remember lying shivering in the hallway, waiting off a rediculous fever, thinking "Thank God I'm Canadian and I don't have to worry about how much this is going to cost."

    Let me tell you: Health care is the basis of any decent democratic society. Not expensing a war, not cutting fat-cat taxes--democracy is about taking care of your people so that they can let your country grow and prosper. It's shameful that the most powerful country in the world would rather spend $1 trillion protecting its people through warfare that a quarter of that keeping them healthy.

    As for pro-choice: The next time a lying, Daddy's boy, 4th-from-the-bottom-of-the-class, flip-flopping, left-his-injured-wife-for-a-younger-woman, creepy old man tells me what I should and shouldn't do with my body, I'll poke him in the eye.

  • 268. jck said:

    McCain is a misogynist. In addition to the choice issue discussed here, scroll down to #1 on this page:

    http://www.eyesonobama.com/blog/content/id_20167/title_McCains-History-o...

  • 269. Tracy said:

    Amen, Heather. It takes courage to put this out here and wait for the bullets to start zinging past your head.

    As echoed above, pro-choice isn't anti-life. I am the mother of 3 and I want options. I gotta believe you all do, too.

  • 270. Kate said:

    I am a woman, and I WAS for McCain until I started watching him become more and more unstable in the debates. He looked constipated, angry, arrogant, and had no damn manners whatsoever. Obama handled everything he threw at him with such class.

    And I thought to myself, McCain is becoming bat-shit crazier every day. SCARY. Nope, not someone I want in the White House. I'll take someone who seems sane, even if he is a liberal. (Who could possibly do worse than Bush anyway?)

    As for my stance on abortion, I am now a pro-lifer who believes in pro-choice rights after having had an abortion. It took going through an abortion for me to see the wrong in it. But would I ever stand and judge a woman for choosing that? Hell no. Not when I had the chance to choose my reproductive future and took it - even to my later regret. I would be a hypocrite otherwise.

    The government has no business being in my body's business.

    I do think that the government needs to make birth control AVAILABLE/AFFORDABLE, even for middle class folks with insurance. I have insurance, I make 50K a year, and I pay $35 a month so that I don't accidentally get pregnant. When there are so many other bills to pay, I could really use a savings in that area. And, if conservatives are so determined to get rid of abortions or lower their occurance, they would give women more affordable options in preventing pregnancy in the first place. Seems like an idea to me ... I don't know why no one is serious in pursuing it, especially when the latest stats show that the abortion rate is rising most for 20-somethings, NOT teens.

  • 271. Sue said:

    Answer to #226

    Sue #211, I think you didn't read the Flotsam or A Little Pregnant posts. Either that or you did read them, and didn't pay a jot of attention.

    Both those posts highlight the heartbreaking cases of pregnancy that cannot be saved - when a mother's life still can. How is it "protecting life" if one is willing to let the mother die along with the fetus? Re-read the Flotsam post, and try to put yourself in her and her husband's shoes.

    I actually did go and read both blogs. And they were absolutely heartwrenching. I will say that I believe for the "life" of the mother, rape or incest abortion should be allowed. My main point was that the government shouldn't HAVE to be involved, but it did get involved and now many innocent baby's are dying for convenience (or inconvenience) and as birth control. The number of abortions for rape, incest and the life of the mother I would guess are significantly less than for the reasons I have a problem with.

    And McCain is not against saving the life of the mother, as referenced here:

    http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/John_McCain_Abortion.htm

    1. McCain supports the following statements:Abortions should be legal only when the pregnancy resulted from incest, rape, or when the life of the woman is endangered.
    2. Prohibit the late-term abortion procedure known as “partial-birth” abortion.
    3. Prohibit public funding of abortions and public funding of organizations that advocate or perform abortions.

    Source: Project Vote Smart, 1998, www.vote-smart.org Jul 2, 1998

    Another interesting article on the subject:
    http://www.newsweek.com/id/164301

  • 272. Rachel E. said:

    Here's where I get frustrated concerning the the abortion argument - Neither side will ever win for the simple fact that the two sides aren't even arguing about the same issue and therefore everyone loses. On the surface it seems to be the same issue - abortion - but it's not at all. One side is fighting for women's rights and the other side is fighting for the rights of babies. All of the billions of dollars spent and protest marches marched and energy expended...for an issue where the two sides aren't even arguing about the same thing. So frustrating...

  • 273. kimmyk said:

    I find it funny that McCain throws around the word "compassion." Where is the compassion when a 12 year-old girl who has been raped by her father is told that she must keep the baby because abortions in any case without exceptions are illegal. This is exactly why McCain scares the shit out of me.

  • 274. Jackie said:

    187. RJ -- Lies? Maybe you should calm yourself down, take your xanax, sweetie, and research the person you're supporting.

    FACTS --
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYRpIf2F9NA

    http://toddmclauchlin.blogspot.com/2008/07/obama-supports-live-birth-abo...

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51121

    http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/08/13/obama-lie...

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27992

    http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=2597

    That should start you off to research some FACTS to see who you're really voting for.

    I don't support outlawing abortions, but neither do I support women being able to use abortion as a form of birth control. It's a difficult issue for me, personally. But I know that I cannot stomach voting for a man who is blind to the horrors his actions can cause.

  • 275. watercolor said:

    Another great blog post about his arrogance on women and their health:
    http://www.uppercasewoman.com/wastedbirthcontrol/2008/10/dear-john-mccai...

  • 276. Liz said:

    Dooce, those ARE wonderful stories from people's lives.

    Here's the sad part: no one gets to read the personal stories from the aborted babies.

    I am looking forward to election day... hopefully the political blogging will stop and you'll get back to what you do best.

  • 277. Anonymous said:

    Based on the majority of comments I just read, our country is going to be in a lot bigger mess than it is now if women are voting on a presidential candidate based on whether they are pro-life or pro-choice. There are ALOT more important issues at stake - and this comment is coming from a woman with two kids who couldn't ever imagine having them aborted, but want to have a country that they can grow and prosper in.

  • 278. Diana said:

    BTW Heather, I get all giddy when you post on politics. Just love it ;)

  • 279. Emily said:

    I´d also like to point out, in addition to the incosistencies in McCain´s ideology that you and others have pointed out, that during the last debate on the portion regarding insurance McCain tried to knock Obama´s plan saying that under his (McCain´s) plan "you can CHOOSE where you get your health insurance." He wants to you have CHOICES about where you put your money. He thinks government has gotten "too big," but oh, wait, this next topic? Abortion? Yeah, you don´t get to have choices with that, sorry. Government needs to get bigger with regards to dictating what women do with their bodies.

    He was so incredibly condescending towards Obama in the last debate that I can´t even begin to imagine having him represent the United States of America in foreign policy. I´m currently in Argentina studying abroad right now and have met many people from all over the world, and well, no wonder everyone thinks Americans are such douche bags. People still think it´s okay to have a prick in office.

    Also, please check out this article: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_re... . It´s long but so worth the read! Cheers, Dooce.

  • 280. Anonymous said:

    kimmyk - McCain is very obviously for abortion in the case of incest and rape. Your hypothetical 12 year old falls into both of those categories.

    Shut up.

    Signed, an Obama supporter.

  • 281. Sweet Herald said:

    This is my last comment, I promise, but what the hell does slavery have anything to do with it, Natalie? Nice way to start a comment.

    Whomever (sorry too many to go back through and find numbers) suggested reading Handmaid's Tale, excellent advice and excellent read. And whomever posted to Natalie regarding the children of Iraq as an example, excellent point.

    Bunny: I have a better name for him.

  • 282. Anonymous said:

    #33: In case you haven't noticed, every other developed nation in the entire planet has health care for all its citizens - all but the U.S. I don't care if it's not explicitly spelled out in the Constitution, I think the fact that everybody else understands the importance of basic health care for citizens, and the responsibility of the gov't to make sure this is provided while the U.S. doesn't shows a real lack of principle.

    I don't believe in a big government, but I think if a country is going to have one govern its people, health care should be a primary right it bestows on its citizens.

    And please don't give me American exceptionalism rhetoric in response... this country will suffer if it doesn't learn lessons from those around it. Heaven knows the last 8 years have been a completely disdain for everyone else - look where that's gotten us.

  • 283. diana said:

    Liz at number 276: There would be no story, you silly. Just two coffins.

  • 284. Anonymous said:

    I have a problem with abortion being a topic that women are actually considering when choosing a presidential candidate. As mentioned above there are more important issues...but not to mention that abortion is something in our country that will never be changed. Lets remember how the legislative system works...it takes majority house and senate to make a bill pass into law...not just the president.

  • 285. Sharon said:

    Maybe off topic or a bad comparison, I am amazed that the same people that are pro life are " usually" the same people who are pro war. Hello.. Protect a fetus at all costs but send young men and women to war on the false pretense we have been attacked by "these people" or they might have weapons of mass destruction.
    The pro life citizens lined a road in my community the other day, whole families with signs etc. For a mile or 2. I wondered how much better they and I would have felt, not to mention some children, if they, all of them, had spent that time with some foster, or orphaned children, adopting, interacting, listening, playing....... They could have held up their signs while they did it or linked to watch me I am taking care of the abandoned or unwanted child, Please don't abort. I just thought, what a total waste of a beautiful Sunday...... I would have been impressed if they had found those children already here, that feel so totally alone and took them to the park for the afternoon.

  • 286. Jennifer said:

    It kills me, I mean absolutely kills me, that abortion is still a hot button issue in this country when it's been legal for such a long time. I wish politicians would just let it go and concentrate on the real issues like universal health care, how to get the economy back on track and how in the hell we are going to end this pointless war and bring our soldier home so they can be with their families. Abortion is seriously the least of our worries right now.

  • 287. Kimba said:

    I don't think abortion is about religion at all, though some people may choose to use that as their basis. It's a moral issue. By being Pro-Choice, you leave no choice for the unborn infant. I have no problem with termination if the mother's life is in jeopardy, but why should one person be allowed to terminate the life of another and not suffer any consequences just because they happen to be carrying the child? How is this any different than homicide?

  • 288. Bob said:

    Woman, relax. No one is going to end abortion because it is a plot by men anyway. We love it. It absolves us of all responsibility. No man will ever allow it to be taken away from us. Our greatest fear is that women will start thinking for themselves about this and realize how they are being used.

  • 289. lizvelrene said:

    My usual question for people who believe that, as someone said above, a human being is created THE SECOND sperm meets egg:

    The human body naturally expells fertilized eggs during menstruation, regularly. Are you volunteering to examine my tampons for evidence of unlawful embryo-killing?

    I mean really, we are talking about biological facts here. If a fertilized egg is a human being, then why don't we mourn the massive "death toll" involved by my NOT being constantly pregnant? Why, every one of those eggs was a potential human being! I should be making babies every chance I get! When those fertilized eggs fail to implant, should I be investigated for not saving them? For being an inhospitable environment?

    All I'm asking is that you make sense. What exactly do you practically propose to enforce something like that? And what would be the penalties for unlawful termination of pregnancy? Will women be tried for suspected abortion every time they fail to give birth? When abortion is illegal, will I be investigated for miscarriage? Just to make sure I didn't do it on purpose? And if I did get convicted of abortion, will I go to jail? What happens to my family when that happens?

    I just can't help thinking that pro-lifers are so completely disconnected from reality that they are unable to think about a practical outcome for their convictions. An America where abortion is illegal would be incredibly ugly and frightening for all women, regardless of whether they actually wanted an abortion or not.

    We hear about backwards countries where women get stoned to death for just the implication of incorrect sexual behavior. I pray that is not where we are headed.

  • 290. Anonymous said:

    Seriously people. McCain is not going to overturn Roe v. Wade. There are so many other fish to fry in the White House. Even if he does become president, he won't make it his mission to piss off all the liberal pro-choice citizens in America and attempt to overturn it. Besides, it's my understanding that he and Palin would rather let the states vote on this issue. Remember his personal opinions matter as much as the staunch liberal!

    Give the man a little more respect. He was a POW for FIVE FREAKIN' YEARS!!! So Step Off! He has been so hammered by the media and has taken it so graciously. OH, that's right, he fought for your right to verbally disrespect him and any other service person in America! Where's your compassion?

  • 291. Online Shopping Chick said:

    I have to agree with #277. While abortion is a very divisive issue the state of the American economy and its poor health care system overall is hopefully what people will be focusing on when they go to the polls. The fact that so many people in America cannot afford health care is something that Americans should be angry with and demanding a solution to.

    Keep your eye on the prize, people. Don't let the side issues get in the way of the bigger picture.

  • 292. Anonymous said:

    You wanna know what scares the shit out of me? People like kimmyk who know nothing about the candidates or their platforms, and yet insist on making toxic and false accusations.

  • 293. Kate said:

    About half of all women are pro-life so I really don't see how McCain's stance on abortion (which mainly has to do with his belief in States' Rights) is something "all women" should consider. This whole notion of "women's issues" is bothersome to me. All issues are women's issues.

    I am a pro-choice social worker who is voting for McCain. Oh yeah, and I LOVE Sarah Palin. Why? Because we are not European Socialists! We are American Capitalists, like it or not (I happen to like it).

  • 294. Anonymous said:

    274- Uh, a person's blog is fact? *snort*

  • 295. HeatherK said:

    I crossed paths with McCain in an airport a few years back. If I had only known then what I know now, he certainly would have gotten an earful from me.

  • 296. Antonia said:

    They are very eloquently worded posts but I'm still voting Republican.....in my eyes, he is the lesser of two evils. There is something about Obama that I can't quite put my finger on, something about him and his politics that just doesn't sit right with me.

    And I don't believe in basing your political choices on the issue of abortion...I don't think that is a presidential issue.

    But I will say that I consider myself pro-life in the sense that I believe that abortion is murder, that life and a soul begins at conception. But I'm not going to harass women that have had one or throw bombs at an abortion clinic. I do think it's disturbing when women see it as a form of birth control.....I can't tell you how many women I have met that I have had 2 or more abortions because they can't seem to understand how babies are made or how to prevent it.

  • 297. Yakovo said:

    "" Air Quotes"" and Mccain telling women what to do with their organs and all that aside here's my little story about being a CRAZY CRAZY lifer.

    My wife and I had the great joy of adopting a beautiful baby boy four years ago.

    I have never had a particular view on abortion until we went through this experience. We got to know our birth mom who lives in California from a family member. She is bright, intelligent 20 year old recovering meth addict who was living on the streets at the time. Her first appointment with our son was to have the pregnancy terminated. Easy enough since medi-cal pays for the procedure and she had gone through the process before.

    Unknown to her at the time is she had waited too long and a "technician" had determined she was 23.5 weeks. She could still have an abortion, she would just have to pay for it since it would be an "operation" to remove the unwanted fetus. Short the estimated 4,000 she opted for "giving up" what she had created.

    Every month we send her updates on the life of this little boy, how he is growing, how he has her strength and determination. He is absolutely fearless in everything he does. We tell him about her, how brave she was for him and how he has two mommies that love him so much.

    Basically he just got lucky, when we counted back he was maybe 22 weeks, just a big baby or the judgment of the "technician" at the time. Nearly every day I look in his blue eyes and think -I'm sure he would have liked to know his brother/ sister that didn't make it to 23 weeks.

  • 298. lizvelrene said:

    Kate, we're already socialists here in the US.

    Didn't you hear? The US Government just bought into the banks. It's called Nationalization.

    Like it or not, we're already there. And that was under George W. Bush, a Republican.

  • 299. Diana said:

    Hihi BOB at 288 you're funny. A clever man would just leave a woman, letting her raise her kids alone, or leaving her to deal with an abortion all by herself. Legislation is not instrumental in this.

  • 300. Tiggerlane said:

    And here, with the title and all, I thought you were implying how insulted women all over America should be at his choice of running mate.

    I thought Obama's answer to the abortion question was as perfect as any non-uterus-owning person's could be. However, I'd like to make McCain a woman with a big, fat uterus full of a child conceived by incest, to see if he would answer differently.

    Such a volatile subject...and your post was perfect.


  • © 2001 - 2009 Armstrong Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Powered by Drupal. Hosted by Liquidweb. Footer Feedicon RSS Feed Footer FM badge Advertise on dooce®