Two of my favorite bloggers in the past couple of days have explained in succinct detail why we (women in particular) should be sickened by John McCain. I implore you to take the time to read these, they're not just a bunch of liberal propaganda or pro-choice cheerleading. These are stories of people's lives.
From Alexa at Flotsam:
McCain states that he would deal with the issue of abortion with “courage and compassion.” I quote: “the courage of a pregnant mother to bring her child into the world and the compassion of civil society to meet her needs and those of her newborn baby.” As if terminating my pregnancy would be the easy way out, the way not requiring his precious “courage.” As if dictating my medical care based upon his religious beliefs is compassionate. And I find it interesting to note that his “compassion” for this newborn does not extend to guaranteeing it health insurance.
And Julie from a little pregnant:
He means us when he holds up his hands and says with that single scornful gesture that we don't matter. That we are a figment of the "pro-abortion movement's" imagination. That — what, we're making this whole "staying pregnant might kill me" thing up?
... even if you're implacably, unconditionally opposed to abortion, a matter on which reasonable people disagree, I don't see any way a thinking person can look at those air quotes and see anything but pandering, contempt, and a dangerous willful ignorance.
1. Katelin said:
they definitely bring up great points and i couldn't agree more.
2. Daddy Scratches said:
And yet, the polls are, for the third election in a row, split rather evenly. Single digit differences do not a mandate make. Frightening.
Can't we just split of into the United Blue Staters of America?
3. Angelbee said:
I can hardly believe that I live in a country where there are still (!) people who think it's okay to have the government control the contents of my womb.
4. Sarahd said:
You might also want to check out Cecily's latest post at Uppercase woman.
http://zia.blogs.com/wastedbirthcontrol/
5. Melissa said:
I completely agree and I have a hard time understanding the religious and political ideology that would allow the stripping of such important rights for women.
6. dana said:
I honestly don't think this air quote thing is as big a deal as people think. I work in the healthcare industry and no one and no legislation is going to put the mother's care second to the baby's. Not going to happen.
I'm part of the ol' 8% --the undecided vote. And I have a uterus. I don't like John McCain, but I do tire of hearing how "scared" everyone is of him, as though he's some complete radical who can single-handedly overturn legislation overnight. But I expect you'll get a lot of the predictable "he's scary" comments.
7. Kristen said:
Yep yep. Great post, great point. I am counting down the days until we can boot this man back to Arizona. (Sorry, Arizona.)
8. Krista said:
Thanks for sharing these, Heather. I was so mad I couldn't see straight during that part of the debate. I do not consider myself pro-choice or pro-life. I believe in a person's right to die with dignity, and I believe in a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy if her health or life is in danger. I don't agree with abortion on demand, but as a woman who lost my child due to complications in a stillbirth and nearly died myself due to the complications, I just wanted to reach through the tv and strangle that bastard!! I don't need a politician to tell me what I can and can't do with my own body should I, God forbid, ever go through that horrific experience again. Which is just one more reason THIS Midwestern Republican is voting for Obama this year!
9. momof4 said:
I am voting for McCain for many reasons, one of which is that he is pro life. I know I am an odd girl out around here, but that is fine. I still like the blog even though we couldn't be more opposite if we tried.
Disagree, without being disagreeable.
10. kelli said:
“the courage of a pregnant mother to bring her child into the world and the compassion of civil society to meet her needs and those of her newborn baby.”
umm...correct me if i am wrong, but this is the party that feels welfare should not exist, but some how the compassion of civil society will meet her needs?
maybe he should place all of the uninsured babies on his personal insurance to make sure they are cared for, think he will go for that...
11. Jenna said:
My father called me this morning and asked if I was voting for McCain... Hoping that maybe in the last 48 hours some experience had altered me into a conservative.
Too bad he lives in a (very) blue state (Mi.) and I live in a (usually) red state (Co.)
He tried to tell me that Palin has more experience than Obama because she is the governor of the biggest state in the union. I told him that there are more elk in Alaska than people...
I can't wait for our Christmas reunion.
Also: On the subject of abortion my favorite bumper sticker is "keep your rosaries off my ovaries."
12. 3baybchicks said:
I couldn't agree more. In addition to the raging abortion issue, there is the frightening reality that by voting for McCain, Sarah Palin could someday be president. Ask yourself, is that really what we want for the US?
13. Sara said:
I try not to vote for presidents based on abortion beliefs. Mostly because abortion will probably NEVER come in front of the President. It'll be a judicial issue or something that won't even make it through congress. But I will vote based on gay marriage rights and the war, which still goes anti-McCain.
14. Songwraith said:
How very "courageous" of you to dive into politics at the risk of alienating about 39% of your readership. You saved me from tuning in on other facets of the liberal media.
I think you are a uniquely talented and creative writer--but I'd rather not hear about your politics.
15. Rebecca said:
I agree with what those other bloggers wrote, but I disagree that we should vote based on one issue. Single issue voting has done nothing but harm for this country. It's time we used a more nuanced approach when it comes to politics.
16. Don said:
The notion that women and doctors would game the, 'if the mother's life is in danger' clause to justify an abortion even when the mother life isn't in danger, is a disgusting insult no matter which side of the abortion issue you are on. Safeguards can certainly be included to reduce abuse. Safeguards MUST be included for the mother's health/life regardless.
There is much cruelty afoot.
17. Krista said:
Dana - I didn't see your post before I posted mine. I'm glad you work in an atmosphere where the mother's life is put above the baby's; however, it's not that way everywhere. The hospital where my son was born is run by the Catholic church, and throughout their history, they have always chosen the life of the baby over the life of the mother. I can't say what is in their official protocol these days, but as little as 15-20 years ago, it was official policy to save the child first, then worry about the mom. In my case, Connor was past saving - he had already died when I arrived at the hospital. Otherwise, God only knows what would have happened to me.
18. Amelia Sprout said:
I love your politics, and the fact that you have featured two of my favorite blogs too. To those who immediately want to dismiss this as just another liberal thing, read the posts. They matter, and I can say that as someone who is not a fan of abortion, but who very much liked living through a life threatening pregnancy.
19. Ann said:
When McCain gives birth through his penis, I will then be willing to listen to him about legislating MY UTERUS.
20. Kim said:
Sorry to go against the majority here but McCain's feelings about abortion are one of the main reasons I am voting for him. Do I think he is going to win? No, I don't - which makes me very nervous for the future of our country.
21. Loretta said:
I am terrified of McCain/Palin. I'm definitely Pro-choice. I've been a single low-income parent. I've had unplanned, unwanted pregnancies. I was so naive, I didn't even realize abortion was an option. My daughters are grown now, and (thankfully) we have loving, healthy relationships. But I've stressed to them the difficulty of having children before they are ready. Teenagers are in no way ready for the demands of parenthood. It limits your choices in life, and makes everything much harder than it should be.
Palin wants to send women back to the dark ages. The combination of reversing Roe vs Wade and denying girls basic sex education leaves them in an extremely precarious situation.
I'm apalled at the otherwise intelligent women I know who intend to vote for McCain/Palin.
22. Anonymous said:
I agree about splitting the U.S. into two countries, too bad we're so economically interdependent. I love Dooce, but couldn't disagree more on her politics.
As a pro-life woman, who has been unable to get pregnant for years now, the complete and utter disrespect for the uniqueness and preciousness of human life continues to astonish me. How a baby being "unwanted" makes it any less of a life, I will never understand.
23. Suzy said:
Thanks for your imput, but no thanks. I'll be voting for McCain/Palin.
24. McKenzie said:
This is not an issue I go to the polls for. And the reason for abortion being a non issue for me is because abortions laws vary form state to state. I live in a state where you have to have parental consent to have an abortion however the next state over (I live in the city on the border of both these states) does not enforce the same consent law. 18 state already have legislation that bans partial birth abortions. Also 18 states have a waiting period however only 11 states enforce it.
So to me Abortion isn't something a presidental canidate can affect. HOWEVER-it is something that my state law makers can influence. And that is why it is just as important to vote in the state elections and well as the federal.
25. AloeWishus said:
Any politician or political party who has an agenda that includes trying to strip me of my rights by turning religious doctrine into law is scary. Period.
Bottom line: VOTE!
Don't get lazy just because the polls show a lead for Obama. Use your voice, use your vote.
26. dooce said:
Please read the posts I linked to before you comment. Otherwise you look dumb.
27. Sarah said:
Re: 9. momof4:
Please don't get it twisted: McCain is NOT pro-life. He is anti-choice. He is pro-unborn fetuses. He is pro-POTENTIAL life. He is pro-life-before-it-actually-needs-resources-in-this-world. After it is born, he ignores its needs, and the needs of its mother.
28. Caren said:
I was screaming at the TV when he made these comments. This is the man who voted against insurance companies covering birth control, against free rape kits for women who've been sexually assaulted, and voted against SCHIP. He's obviously a man who really cares about women and children.
29. laura said:
Abortion is the very reason why i cannot ever vote Democrat.
Ever.
My family has adopted five children - all special needs. All who might've been aborted because they were special needs. They weren't and now my family is more blessed because of the children we have.
i'm not particulary fond of McCain but i cannot and will not vote Democrat in this day and age.
30. adrienne said:
the idea of roe v. wade being overturned is impossible for me to contemplate. however, i have increasing faith in the american people that the right decision will be made on nov 4th.
31. dooce said:
I REPEAT: Please read the posts I linked to before you comment. Otherwise you look dumb.
32. grace said:
As someone who has worked in the medical industry for some time now and seeing the things I have seen, I believe in both the miracle of birth and the necessity of abortion.
I think sometimes people who are pro-life automatically assume pro-choice is a pseudonym for "KILL ALL BABIES" instead of meaning the right to make a choice. I'm pro-choice for the right to choose whether or not to have a baby, whether or not I exercise my right to vote, whether or not to have one more twinkie.
All I want as a human being is the right to choose what I do to and what happens to my body. I don't think it is right to let someone else choose that for me. I am no man's property. I belong to myself.
33. jill said:
I'm sorry, but NO where in the history of the US does it say, we DESERVE health care. Why do democrats think that everyone is entitled? It's a judgement call... If you work hard you earn the right, it's not just to be given to everyone.
NO guarantees in life baby...
ps... I am unemployed with NO insurance and still believe this to be. Also, my mom died from heart failure because she stopped taking her high blood pressure medicine because she thought she couldn't afford it any longer. Her fatal flaw was not asking for help from her family, but never did she think she should be just GUARANTEED health care from the universe. She wasn't a martyr either.
People who have money, easily think that everyone should receive as well, as I think I remember Heather stating that she would easily give up some of her hard earned money to help those without. In my opinion though, it's easy to think you'd give it when you have it. But those who don't have, shouldn't have to give as well as they shouldn't expect to receive!!
Those of you who think you're going to get some fantastic tax break because you're in the Middle Class range, you just better hope your company doesn't go and lay you off in a year or two because their taxes have risen and they don't have enough money left to pay for your salary!
just my opinion of course...
34. bluegirl said:
Comments like Sara's prompt me to say: if you think the president's views on your hot button issues don't matter, please consider how much the Supreme Court has changed in the last 8 years. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito were nominated by GW Bush, and significantly altered the tenor of the Court. If Justice Stevens (88 years old) retires, SCOTUS will be 4-3 conservative-liberal, with Justice Kennedy as the lone indie.
The choice we make this election will likely have long-lasting repercussions on issues like abortion, gay marriage, gun control, and habeas corpus for prisoners in Guantanamo Bay. If any of those happen to be important to you, please research the candidates and VOTE!
35. Sarah said:
AND, Heather I wish you'd do a post about McCain's other anti-woman votes, other than the abortion thing. He voted AGAINST the Lily Ledbetter Equal Pay Act! Saying it would open up employers to too many lawsuits! FOR NOT PAYING WOMEN THE SAME AS MEN!!! Even if you are anti-choice, if you are female and in the work force, McCain should still scare the crap out of you.
36. Ellen said:
My question is: When did being "Pro-Choice" turn into being "Pro-Abortion"?
37. almost vegetarian said:
He is a scary little man, indeed. But, as scary as he is, Sarah Palin and her asking her local library how, exactly, one goes about banning books makes me positively whimper with fear.
38. Kristy said:
I was just wondering, after reading your post yesterday, would you vote for McCain had you had the same mindset and values as you did in college?
39. Amy Kate said:
I always love hearing the term "pro-abortion" - are there really people that are "pro-abortion"? I was visiting family in downstate Illinois a few weeks ago, and honest to god, they (women, in their late teens, early 20s) talked about Obama being "pro-abortion" and democrats in general being so. I had to walk away (my blood pressure had been rising since they proclaimed that they "really really like that Sarah Palin. How great to have a woman that close to the White House!"). I came back and said to them that while I did not want to talk politics because I love them and it would turn ugly as we disagree, that I don't think there are people around who are PRO abortion, like approaching pregos on the street with a hanger saying, "Hey toots! Wanna have some fun? Let's rib that sucka outta your ute!" NO ONE LIKES ABORTION. But it is necessary. It needs to be SAFE. LEGAL. RARE. It needs to be an option, you know, a CHOICE for women, families, young girls who are in no position- for reasons that I don't need to be privy to (nor does John McCain, Barack Obama, or anyone else)- to bring a child into the world. IT HAPPENS. It happens in "innocent" ways (oops, no condom), it happens in ugly ways (incest, rape), it happens in ways that nature just makes happen (health/life of mother, no quality of life for baby once born). So yes, there needs to be a choice available. I know that I'm kind of ranting all over the place, but I just have been on a tirade about it lately.
And kudos to the other commenter for noting that he wouldn't provide health care for this kid once it popped out! That's the other thing - abortion rights - yes, an important issue, but that shouldn't be THE issue (especially in light of everything else going on in our country) we're hanging our hats on. There are so many other issues (very intertwind) that have so much more impact on our lives, our children's lives, and, yes, John, that have more impact on those of us "brave" enough to have children and raise them despite soaring health care costs, high gas prices, poor educational standards, and so on. ARGH!
40. Courtney said:
What really drove me crazy about that was just mere minutes before making the airquoted comments, he'd railed about being a federalist in the context of healthcare. A federalist, who believes that the government shouldn't interfere with Americans' choice regarding their healthcare, it should be a free market not regulated by the government. If the government stepped in, they'd lose their choice! About healthcare! My husband and I were screaming at Obama on the TV screen during the later abortion segment of the debate: TELL HIM HE SHOULD BE A FEDERALIST ABOUT ABORTION THEN TOO! ISN'T THAT CHOICE A PART OF MY OWN PERSONAL DECISION ABOUT "HEALTHCARE"? Augh.
41. Patience St. James said:
Abortion is the reason I will never, ever vote Republican. I don't care what your personal beliefs are on the matter--you do not get to choose for others, not what they eat, not what they do sexually, and certainly not what they do medically. It astounds me that the party who claims to be for state's rights and personal rights and responsibility also are strongly for 'moral' legislation to keep others from doing things that make them uncomfortable, and it disturbs me greatly that women would vote for such horrible people.
42. JO said:
I won't vote for John McCain largely because of his views on abortion. However, he does not sicken me in any way. I disagree with him, but he has led a great life and made difficult decisions many times in his life. He is a man, unlike the vast majority of Pro-life men, who has faced decisions and situations worse than an unwanted pregnancy.
It's worth noting that Obama said roughly the following in the debate:
"I fully support making late-term abortions illegal except to save the life or the health of the mother."
What did he mean by late-term? Hard to say, completely ambiguous. Did he vote against the bill that would have made so-called partial birth abortions, done almost exclusively to save the life of the mother, illegal, even when the health of the mother was endangered? NO. He voted present.
Obama is no saint wrt abortion rights either. He is clearly the better choice for those of us who value abortion rights, but he is not passionate about the issue.
43. Phoo-d said:
For the record, I don't agree with McCain's stance on this one, but what I find more horrifying is that people will base their vote on this single issue. How frightening is it that in the face of two failed wars, a global financial crisis, looming problems with Medicare and Social Security, some people are basing their vote ONLY on which way a candidate feels about abortion. That makes me afraid, very afraid.
44. Jodie said:
Choice is just that. It's a woman's choice to have a child or not, in consultation with her spouse, her doctor and her clergy. That's what Roe v. Wade is about. Just because someone is pro-choice that doesn't mean that I want everyone to have an abortion. I would like it to be safe, legal and rare. I don't understand the problem most anti-abortion people have with it. If you're against abortion then don't have one. But don't infring upon my right to choose.
The scary fact is that if McCain is the next president, then when he appoints one or two new Supreme court justices, then Roe v. Wade will likely be overturned. States would have the option to make abortion illegal again. Resulting in many women choosing illegal abortions and possibly death as a result of them... just like in the bad old days prior to Roe v. Wade.
45. jonniker said:
When Alexa casually mentioned during the debate that his policies could mean that she'd be dead, I was stopped in my tracks. Seriously. No one puts it in better, more human perspective than she does, and though I sent it to everyone I know before I saw this, I am so grateful that you're giving her post an even larger audience than I could have.
Thank you.
46. Anonymous said:
Long time lurker, first time poster.
I was so offended by McCain's choice of words - calling it the "pro-abortion" movement. As Barack Obama pointed out, no one is pro-abortion. Why can't we agree that both sides want to reduce the number of abortions? The pro-CHOICE movement wants to keep abortion safe and legal while also investing in prevention such as sex education, family planning, birth control resources and counseling.
When the pro-life movement actually puts into place plans to help the mother after giving birth - with childcare, education resources, job training, etc - then I might change my tune. But the pro-lifers I have had the pleasure of talking to are only concerned with the birth of the child and don't expect to put any resources towards these babies or their mothers once they are born.
And don't even get me started on McCain's laugh and roll of the eyes when talking about the mother's "health" - his quotes, not mine. How any woman can vote for this man is beyond me.
47. cck said:
It was incredibly insulting. I reacted strongly to what Julie wrote. The idea that anyone can dictate my health care decisions scares me to death.
Please, keep the hell away from my uterus.
48. Pro, just pro said:
What I've always hated about this issue were the terms used for your stance - you're either pro-life (can you hear the choirs of angels singing??) or pro-choice (hmmm, I think I’ll flip a coin to see if I’ll get an abortion today…). It’s not like pro-choicer are out there trying to persuade pregnant women to get an abortion (“Oh come on Suzy, everybody’s doing it”), and yet, what, the government thinks that women aren’t smart enough to make this life-changing decision on our own – so they better do it for us? I’m not pro-life, but I’m not pro-death either. I’m pro-making-the-best-decision-for-my-situation.
49. Anonymous said:
I wonder if McCain's daughter was raped and got pregnant if he would assume that she would have the "courage and compassion" to have it. Government needs to stay the hell out of my insides.
50. Stacy said:
Sigh! I will be glad when this election is over so you will go back to being funny.
51. Lee said:
I know what he was trying to say there. He was trying to say that a woman could exaggerate a relatively mild complication in order to get an abortion, on the grounds that her health is at risk. I get that. But I still think he's full of shit. Pray tell, Senator, at which point does my health matter to you? If there's a 15% chance that the pregnancy would kill me, would you force me to carry that pregnancy to term? What about 25%? 35%? Really, I want to know the point at which the chance that I MIGHT DIE starts to matter to you.
52. Sarah said:
To JO:
Late-term is generally taken to mean third trimester.
And Obama did not vote for that bill because it did NOT include a provision for the life or health of the mother. It just flat-out banned partial-birth abortions without any exceptions for the mother. That's why he (and many others - it did not pass) didn't feel comfortable voting for it.
53. Heather said:
Ditto, ditto, ditto. While I'm not choosing to vote for Obama because of this single issue (but I will vote for him because of the many issues on which I agree with him), I do think it's important to keep in mind that the next president will appoint at least one person to the supreme court. The court could be asked to clairfy/modify/change the Roe decision. While I think it would have to be something pretty radical to get the court to take the case, the very possibility makes me consider a presidential candidate's opinion on the issue.
I appreciated the moment in the debate when Obama said that nobody is "pro-abortion". Exactly.
54. Patrick said:
#39 - There is nothing innocent about "forgetting" to use a condom and winding up pregnant. Rape is another thing. For crying out loud people...live with your choices, mistake or not.
55. Laura College said:
Are you kidding? Heather, you seem like a reasonable human being, but you're a parent! Haven't you heard about Obama voting to continue LIVE BIRTH ABORTION? And McCain sickens you? Seriously, I realize that we all have different political views, but this seems pretty cut-and-dried to me. McCain wasn't my first choice for a Republican candidate, but at least he doesn't want parents giving birth to children they don't want, then leaving them in a biohazard room to die. If you're going to boil this election down to one issue, my choice is clear: McCain/Palin
56. cck said:
One more thing. Beyond the words that McCain uses to pander to his base, I hated the air quotes.
I hated the air quotes combined with the sound of him sucking his teeth. I cannot stand to listen to that for the next four years.
GO KNOCK ON DOORS. VOLUNTEER TO DRIVE YOUR NEIGHBOR TO THE POLLS. GO VOTE!!!
57. Lucy said:
I'm sad that our country can't have two better candidates than McCain and Obama. More to the point, I don't see Rowe overturned anytime soon. It's too much of a hot potato politically. Bush the Second is anti-abortion and nothing changed.
Neither of these clowns, uh, I mean candidates, is going to touch abortion with a ten foot poll.
Love the blog too!
58. dooce said:
Yes, Stacy, because being funny is so much more important than my civil rights.
59. Sarah said:
Laura College, do your research. Obama voted "present" on the partial-birth abortion bill because it didn't include any exceptions for the life or health of the mother. He has said he would vote for a ban as long as it included that exception.
60. poptart said:
He is a cluless ass. I do not understand how the masses thinks he is in touch with today's needs. Abortion is not the governments business. Plain and simple.
61. Jamie said:
I shared Alexa's post on google reader last night because I felt it was something everyone should read.
It's a great post. I'm off to read Julie's now.
62. Annie said:
I am, frankly, baffled by much of the rhetoric coming from the conservative side regarding women's health and reproductive choices -- namely abortion, obviously. It seems as though they think women are just RUNNING OUT TO HAVE ALL SORTS OF IMMORAL AND CRAZY SEX ALL THE DAMN TIME SO THEY CAN GET THEIR ABORTIONS! ABORTIONS! MY GOD WE JUST LOVE GETTING ABORTIONS!
I don't know a single woman who has had an abortion without a second thought. Even if she hasn't had to struggle with guilt (like many of us raised in Christian or other conservative households do), she has had to struggle with how she is perceived by friends and family or even her lover.
The other day, I saw a conservative blog ranting about how us liberals want women to go around having wild, unprotected sex just so we will get knocked up and have abortions, thereby (and I shit you not, they actually said this) "Fund the multi-billion dollar per year abortion mill industry."
My mom still refuses to vote for Obama because, "he is okay with killing babies."
63. leigh said:
I understand the sentiment behind the two blog posts, but having watched the debate I'm not so sure that's what was meant. When there is a life threatening health concern with a mother, reasonable professionals would interpret the law to save the baby if possible, but also preserve the life of the mother. I don't agree with abortion, so I wouldn't agree with an abortion as a precautionary measure, but medicine is so advanced that a baby could be born 4 months early and still become a normally functioning human being. If the life of the mother is in danger, her health should come first while trying to save the baby, if possible. I'm not sure John McCain wouldn't agree with that. Abortion cannot be made to use as a precautionary tool where is pregnancy becomes uncomfortable or inconvenient further along women can terminate at will. Pregnancy has inherent risks! You assume those risks by getting pregnant.
Furthermore, women who complain about it being "their uterus, their choice" - yeah, it is your choice...to get pregnant. Having unprotected/no contraceptive sex removes your choice to get pregnant. I wish people would just be a little bit more responsible instead of always looking for a way out.
64. Emily said:
Heather--
I love your writing. I repeat-LOVE YOUR WRITING. I never miss a day of reading each and every post. I must say though, please get over the fact that every single person in this country (including your readers) have varying opinions on every issue. It's becoming very clear that your "open-mind" is narrowing more and more every day by consistently closing the door on any opinion that isn't yours. And, hey, I'm even voting for Obama. We're on the same side and I'm still getting tired of your rants.
65. Anonymous said:
Since when are we "guaranteed" insurance? I am a single mother of 3 children and have worked my butt off to insure they are covered by insurance. The government should stay out of it.
66. grudge girl said:
Thank you for those links. They were so affecting. I immediately posted the links on my facebook, knowing it would piss off my conservative friends and family members, because I have the tiny hope that one of these entries will make one of them think in a broader way about this subject. (I'm hoping for my 18 yr old niece, who I love so much in spite of her extreme conservative views and troublingly uncomplicated sense of rightousness, and who is like the Lutheran twin of the teenager you used to be.) It's worth pissing people off if you can help even one person expand his or her perspective.
As I'm sure you know.
67. Sarah said:
Am I going to get in trouble for commenting so much? So many people are uninformed...
To Lucy (#57): McCain himself can't overturn it, of course, but the Supreme Court Justices he appoints CAN. Right now there is only a one-vote margin (yes, ONE VOTE) in the court that would keep Roe there. That one vote is Ginsburg, who is, well, old. It is very likely to project that the president we elect on Nov. 4 will have at least one, if not two, appointments to the Supreme Court.
68. GEORGE! said:
HOW DARE YOU WRITE ABOUT SOMETHING YOU CARE ABOUT ON YOUR VERY OWN BLOG!
I can't even talk about politics with my family, I just avoid saying anything whenever Daniel starts to talk about Obama.
69. Hannah said:
I saw a great comment recently: "If the fetus you save is born gay, will you continue to fight for its rights?"
70. Nelson said:
When I read Alexa's entry I teared up. I watched the debate and McCain's response caught me as inappropriate generally for various reasons. There are a lot of things I don't understand about extremely religious people. For example I can't understand why Bush would oppose abortion on moral grounds but be fine with lying to the American people in an attempt to start a war in Iraq that would kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqs and thousands of Americans. The same religion that allowed slavery to exist in this country as a biblical right. This things are beyond my understanding. But as I heard McCain speak it occured to me that the value of an unborn life is given more weight by them than a living breathing person. As a father I now understand that I and my wife would both give our lives willingly for our children. And as Alexa said the choice of aborting the living being wiggling inside of you is not one made on a whim. Decisions on when these procedures should or should not apply should be left in the hands of doctors and parents not in the hands of people driven blind by religion. A religion that can be twisted to make slavery and war appropriate. A religion that can change to fit the holder's needs is not an objective body that deserves to be foisted upon the masses.
71. kevin said:
LAURA 29;
you say that in this day and age, you must vote republican.
are you referring to "this day and age" where our own government eavedrops
on everyday citizens? where they condone torture? where they have unregulated the banking and investing system to where we now give up OUR tax dollars to bail out billionaires? "in this day and age" where we attack countries that have not provoked or attacked us, and in turn, spent thousands of american lives and spent billions of dollars, and made corporations rich, where youre government lied to take us to war, where the environment is not cared for, especially if its stewardship is in the way of making a buck, where dumbness is rewarded, where to question the government is mocked as "unamerican"?
THOSE days and ages??? mostly, or almost exesclusively brought to you by a
REPUBLICAN ADMINASTRATION???
the mind boggles.....
72. Anonymous said:
Is there really a separation between religion and the state in this country? Between the gay marriage issues, abortion rights issues and stem-cell research issues.....seems like there is actually very little that is not governed by religion here.
73. jennifer said:
The real point is missed when politics are involved. It is kinda like being "green". Why waste time,the baby, mental anguish, unnecessary medical procedures and the wondering about what we got rid of for the rest of our lives.We women need to take responsibility and not get pregnant in the first place. Why torture ourselves with the decision to have an abortion when we could just choose responsibity in the first place. Let's not leave it to the government to control what happens in our womb, let us take control of our own wombs.
74. maresi said:
I've read both posts, and largely agree. However, I'm far, far more scared of the effect on women's health issues from bully obstetrician-gynecologists and their propaganda machines waging war on normal physiological birth. Talk about removing choice, and using fear as a weapon...
Please read Pushed by Jennifer Block to learn more about how much of the current hospital, physician, and insurance systems are assaulting women everyday.
75. Becky..Absent Minded Housewife said:
I'm pissed about McCains 5k health deduction. He really has no clue to what it takes to privately insure a healthy and FERTILE adult woman.
As for abortion, I'm loathe to have my uterus legislated. I have no opinion on a right to choose but I do have an opinion on decisions about my own health and body. Reproduction and sex, not exactly a black and white issue.
And not an issue I want to hear about coming out of the mouth of a known womanizer.
76. Cyndi said:
Voters need to understand that YES the next president WILL have the power to overturn Roe v Wade and many other important legislation. Educate yourself about how the Supereme Court works people. Justice Stevens is not well and it is a very real possibility that the next President will be appointing his replacement. They are so close to a majority already, it will only take one more vote to change your life (and your rights) for a very long time. And I am not just talking about Roe v Wade either. The Supreme Court has very real power. Learn it, understand it, and VOTE.
77. Jessica said:
If anyone has picked up a Cosmo for November lately, they have a fantastic article about the differences in the candidates policies in regards to women. Everything from title IX to health insurance and of course abortion. Just reading the two compared side by side like that is enough to make every woman disgusted by McCain.
On a side note: I spent over 2 hrs on the phone with my doctor and my insurance company the other day battling out whether or not the insurance would cover my $25 birth control prescription...yeah they covered $5...thanks for helping me not get pregnant and become a drain on society! My "health" is more important than any other topic up for discussion in any debate and McCain and his air quotes can shove it!
78. Tanya said:
1. It's probably a good thing he's running for President, and not Supreme Court Justice then, right? (Hint: The President can't overturn Roe v Wade.)
2. Even if enough liberal Justices died/retired and were replaced with conservative judges (With a Democrat-majority congress to fight the nominations? Impossible.) who wanted to overturn Roe v Wade, that doesn't mean abortion becomes illegal. It just means that it stops being federally mandated. The decision on abortion would go back to the individual states.
So relax. Jeez. Hysteria isn't going to help anyone.
79. gingela5 said:
I don't believe in abortion--that being said I'm not voting for EITHER party.
80. uc freak said:
I would like to see every pro-life person adopt an unwanted child, before they can decide they are pro-life. If that happened, maybe there would be no need for abortion.
Also, for those who say if you work hard, you can afford healthcare, I disagree. There are many people who have to take low paying jobs with no benefits, for their own personal reasons. And, we all rely on these jobs to get done. I always think, 'but for the grace of God' that could be me. To quote 'Barnyard'- A strong man helps himself, a stronger man helps others.
81. Anonymous said:
Geez...I am tired of all this McCain bashing. I'm an intelligent woman, and I'm sick of this knee-jerk reaction to anything that is Republican. People, Roe vs. Wade will NEVER be overturned. Republicans HAVE to be pro-life. Democrats HAVE to be pro-choice.
Did you hear Barack Obama the other night? Or Joe Biden? When they spoke about gay marriage (and their LACK of support for it)? These are our liberals?
And for your information, I'm voting third party.
82. kathryn said:
I know you will get flack for this post, as you always do with anything of the political. But speaking for those of us who do not have a popular blog for a platform, THANK YOU!
83. Anonymous said:
Alexa's post gave me the chills (and for anyone who has just read the Dooce blurb and not the whole thing, I highly recommend you read it all, the blurb doesn't capture even half the power of the post). Every time McCain say's "Pro-abortion" I cringe. Who in their right mind would be "for" something that is so hard to go through? As someone whose been there and had to make that tough choice I find it personally offensive. I am Pro-Choice, not Pro-Abortion, there is a VERY big difference.
84. Sharon said:
I have both a uterus and a brain. And I'm still voting for McCain/Palin.
85. Cheyenne said:
McCain is the lesser of two evils, so to speak, and I, for one, will NOT be voting for that other one. Not by a long shot. Not in your dreams or anybody else's dreams. Never.
86. Kristen said:
I read both of these great ladies blogs and appreciate them so much for being able to say what so many of us want to say but can't. And thank you Heather for sending the masses to their sites so that maybe more people can understand just how dangerous it would be for John McCain to be in office.
87. HorribleLicensePlates said:
Oh I know. I just cringed when McCain started talking about this. How can you not be outraged at what he was saying? I just looked over at my husband and we both took another drink.
88. Scargosun said:
The spirit in me tells me that abortion is wrong...for me. My spirit also tells me that absolutely
NO ONE
EVER
has the right to tell me what to do with my body, her body or his body.
This is not the only campaign issue and it actually should not be a campaign issue at all but I am going to fight until I have no fight left for my fellow Americans. This government has no right to tell me or anyone else what to do with their bodies.
89. Elizabeth said:
And who are you going to vote for then? Obama supports the ban on 'partial-birth' abortions. It's a medical procedure which is, as far as I know, only used because it is necessary for medical reasons. As I see it, both major party candidates are willing to tell women what they can and can not do with their reproductive organs. As a woman who struggled for four years with infertility and who has read those blogs you quote and many others like them I know what can go wrong, and I really can't find either candidate's position on the issue acceptable.
90. Laura said:
I'm pro-life. So are all democrats.
I am pro- programs that provide life-sustaining services, including food, shelter, and healthcare to women, families and children.
I am pro- bringing life into the world in a responsible manner. So I support sexuality education and healthcare programs that empower women and their partners to decide when to become parents by providing them with knowledge and access to family planning resources, including accurate and practical information regarding abstinence, natural family planning, barrier methods, and hormonal contraception.
I am pro-mothers. I believe all women who become pregnant should have a legitimate choice - to decide whether they wish to parent a child, become a birthmother, or terminate the pregnancy. I believe that the government has a role in ensuring that all of these choices are real possibilities, and not theoretical abstractions. ("Deciding to parent" is great, but if the government is so committed to the sanctity of the life inside my hypothetical womb, I want you to promise my future child that I will have the resources to be a good parent.)
Nobody is pro-abortion.
But my vote goes to the politician who recognizes that, even when all of the above programs are in place (... all of them, surprisingly, the kinds of programs that conservatives generally oppose), there will still be a need for abortions. And when that need arises, the decision of whether and how and when to terminate the pregnancy is a medical one. My vote goes to the politician who recognizes that he is not my doctor, and he is not my conscience, and he is not God - he cannot possibly imagine all of the possible scenarios that will dictate what the "right" choice would be in any given situation. So he will trust that I - and all women - are capable of making the best decisions for ourselves and our children.
91. Emily said:
Heather, thank you for those two links. I am not a single issue voter in general, but I truly believe this issue is SO important to the general wellbeing of women that it would be impossible for me to vote for anyone who discards the "health" of women in such a flip manner.
As someone who has struggled with infertility for three years, and has had a medical abortion to remove an ectopic pregnancy (that was absolutely wanted and planned), I am horrified by the idea that there are people out there who would think that even THAT is immoral.
I also don't see this as a single issue, but rather an all encompassing view of women's rights in general. The way McCain spoke of women who have late-term abortions for medical reasons was very telling of his views in general, and combined with Palin's fundamentalist worldview, I was pushed over the edge. I was not an Obama supporter, but I am now.
92. renee said:
"It's becoming very clear that your "open-mind" is narrowing more and more every day by consistently closing the door on any opinion that isn't yours. "
I agree. When I read your "mortified" post the other day it occurred to me that you are an all-or-nothing gal. You really go deep into your beliefs and then close your mind to the other options. Which is fine, this is your blog, this is your life, but it is kind of ironic as it is the opposite of what you preach so proudly.
93. Anonymous said:
to #67 -
The president alone cant elect a new Supreme Court Justice that would sway the vote on overturning Roe V Wade. You think a democratic Senate would let McCain elect a conservative, Pro-Life Justice? Prolly not.
94. KC said:
I have a hard time reading these comments about the government ignoring the needs of its citizens when it comes to health care issues. For single mothers and families who cant afford health insurance there are several programs available where families dont have to pay a dime, such as the CHIP program.
I just have a hard time wanting to rely on the government for health care. They have done a horrible job at running Social Security, and if you want to see how government really runs health care talk to a Vet who has had the wonderful pleasure of using the VA for care services and see how smoothly their experiance went.
I for one, am more scared of becoming a socialist society and destroying the capitalist fire that makes this country great. What happened to Americans working hard and taking care of themselves, providing opportunity for their businesses to grow. Now days we are to quick to turn to the government for handouts when things get tough. I understand that there will always be people in need and there are programs availble to take care of them.
Obama is all about socializing health care, as well as getting rid of those evil companies who have actually made a profit. Who do you think will pay the taxes that he intends to raise on the corperate world. We will cause they will raise prices on their products to cover the costs of the extra taxes they have to pay. I got a C+ in Economics in college and I can understand that policy.
In the fragile state that our Economy is in do we really need more taxes put on struggling companies that are barely making ends meet. I have had my own business, and know how it is to do $300,000 a year in business and barely make it cause of all the costs that are involved in running your own business. And believe me you pay a lot of taxes on the money your business makes, at the end of the month there isn't very much left over for your own pay check. It is not that I make $300,000 a year but my business does that much in sales a year. If the taxes were to increase for my type of business it would cripple my business and probably make it fail, along with several other businesses in this country. That is why Obama scares the shit out of me!
95. Anonymous said:
ok, coming from somebody who had an abortion because of a past rape experience, it scares me to read comments from women...(esp. women!) who think that I didnt sit there and claw my hair out thinking about my future, what abortion meant and how it was going to effect me...what it would be like to raise a child from an experience that took many years of tears, confusion and self-hate to comes to terms with. this does not mean that i wouldnt love that child, but at that point in my life i was not able to deal with looking at a child who was not produced out of love, but was produced out of greed, anger and hate. call me selfish...go ahead, i dont fucking care.
rape was not my choice, but my happy, healthy future was.
96. Anonymous said:
Thank you, Heather, for continuing to bring up issues that are important. I LOVE your blog, and the mix of light and serious topics.
For the people who only want you to be fluffy and light, I suggest they stop reading and go back their bonbons and Days of Our Lives...
The rest of us CARE about what's going on in this country and aren't afraid to hear and talk about it.
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
97. Anonymous said:
Wow Kev--You are so good at spitting out the sound bites!!
98. AmyH said:
When J-Mc made those air quotes when he was talking about the health of the mother I wanted to scream. HOW is it that pro-life ends when a baby is born? What about the mother's life? Isn't that still valuable?
And I am so offended that he chooses to call the pro-choice movement the "pro-abortion" movement. I am 100% pro-choice and 100% anti-abortion--for me. I would never judge you for making a different choice and I would certainly never say that ANYONE is pro-abortion. I know that it is a very hard decision and it is never taken lightly.
Shame on him for his treatment of women, especially given that he has daughters.
99. Anonymous said:
Yep. Never any emotions involved in politics. Clear, analytical thinking all the way down.
We're Pro-Choice, not Pro-Abortion! WE want to decide when it's the RIGHT TIME to kill a defenseless baby.
Get out of my UTERUS government officials! I say when my BABY dies. AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, You CANNOT and SHOULD NOT take the choice away from me whether to nurture a child or be able to afford more songs for my frickin' awesome iPod.
You (McCain) don't want to defend the helpless! You want to ensure all women are barefoot and pregnant! Bastard! 'Health' has never been used by the 'pro-choice' movement to mean 'almost anything'!! It's mainly been used to get more fetuses dead!
100. Loretta said:
You're right. I was dumb.
Those links are powerful. Very well written and definitely make the point. Thank you for sharing.
101. Jessica said:
My only question to everyone here is how do you justify killing someone. In my opinion a baby is a person the SECOND that conception occurs, the SECOND. Things happen and babies die, things happen and mothers die. It is sad either way. But Before I had my children I told my husband that if anything was to happen to me that they were to save my baby, I would lay down my own life for my children and I can't imagine a mother that wouldn't.
102. Pixelfish said:
Anon@83: I believe Obama himself noted that nobody is really pro-abortion per se--as abortion is a not-fun, invasive medical procedure. But what pro-choicers are in favour of is access to birth control, unbiased information, and medical options for women that will hopefully prevent the need for abortion in most cases. But every woman should retain the right to make a decision about her body--being pregnant can be a huge bodily change, at best, and a life-threatening situation, at worst--and she should be able to decide for herself. Every time I hear people refer to abortion as a convenience, it makes me see red. There is nothing "convenient" about a costly surgery (although thanks to PP, semi-affordable compared to other surgeries) which you will spend a week or two recovering from. Nobody waves a magic wand and *poof* you aren't pregnant anymore. It's a medical choice.
Also, I'd like to note that while McCain and Palin talk about equal pay for women, McCain couldn't be bothered to vote on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, but said he would have opposed it anyway, since he said it opened up the possibility for frivolous lawsuits. Basically when McCain talks women's rights, he's insincere. He's used the word "frivolous" to refer to both abortion and equal pay--I can't take him seriously as a candidate that would support me.
103. Krysta said:
comment #33: "I'm sorry, but NO where in the history of the US does it say, we DESERVE health care. Why do democrats think that everyone is entitled? It's a judgement call... If you work hard you earn the right, it's not just to be given to everyone."
No, it does not say anything about deserving health care in the written law, but we are talking about people. Maybe it's just me, but if we are valuing life here I think it is fair to say that human beings do deserve access to affordable care. I am not sure what the solution is but when people, like your mother, are dying becasue they are denied care or cannot afford life saving medication while insure companies are profiting, I think there is a call for reform.
And the part about if you work hard you earn the right to health care is complete bullshit. Nearly 60% of uninsured adults work full time. So working hard doesn't ensure you anything.
104. Kris said:
I can't wait for November 5th.
Sigh.
105. RJ said:
I do not "like" the idea of abortion. I am not "pro-abortion" Who is??
I urge everyone, regardless of their opinions of abortion to read this article
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/01/25/my_late_te...
It is a story of a woman who very much loved and wanted her baby who had to make a gut-wrenching decision. A decision that ANY woman could be faced with. I am pregnant and this does scare me.
To say that it is irresponsible to call John McCain "Scary" is totally wrong. Please read this story and see how easily your rights can be taken away. See how doctors like the one in this story are leaving the practice for fear of possible prosecution.
I don't like the idea of abortion, but you cannot legislate morality.
106. Right On said:
When anyone reduces an election to a single issue--especially one that involves the right to fill an unborn child--it is sad.
Your original example from Alexa of Flotsam is a perfect example. She puts words in Sen. McCain's mouth that he DID NOT SAY. But that's so typical of the liberal left. He did NOT say having an abortion is the easy way out (that's Alexa's own guilt shining through). If she wants to question what is compassionate, she should ask Obama why he voted not to have hospitals provide care for babies that survived botched abortions. Hmmm. Apparently that is the modicum of compassion the majority of posters here subscribe to.
All of which is why it is harder and harder to justify any meaningful friendships with anyone who is a bleeding heart Liberal. Many of whom value the life of a convicted murder or child molester more than they do that of an unborn child.
Stances such as this totally ignore the fact that the vast majority of Americans see the abortion issue in shades of gray...not black or white. Very few think no abortions should ever be allowed in any circustances. And very few think abortions should be allowed at any time for any reason even into the third trimester. Well, except for a few here who reduce everything to a up/down litmus test on abortion. Get a life.
107. Tanya said:
80. uc freak said: I would like to see every pro-life person adopt an unwanted child, before they can decide they are pro-life
---
Bad example, in this case. The McCains did adopt an "unwanted" child. You haven't noticed that one of their daughters doesn't look like the rest?
108. ErinM said:
Alexa and Julie are very eloquent. I agree with them wholeheartedly. I am also VERY glad that I have already voted by absentee ballot and you can bet it wasn't for McCain and that backwards woman Palin. I'm curious how many others out there have already voted by absentee.
109. R.E. said:
I am very pro-choice, but I respect and understand the position of those that are pro-life AND support the government investing in children and mothers at risk financially. Life is magnificent and worthy of being saved and cherished. If you believe that and are willing to follow up, I understand.
However, I seem to have encountered far more pro-lifers who seem to only really care while battling about the well-being of a baby in someone else's uterus.
Personally, I think that every woman needs to be able to make the choices best for her own life, and that especially includes protecting her own health.
How can you be pro-life, but not pro-the life of the mother?
110. Corinna said:
I love everyone saying that women should just make sure to use contraceptives and they won't get pregnant, so abortion shouldn't be an issue. Guess what? I was an unplanned child, courtesy of condom failure. My brother was a failure of both condoms AND birth control pills. Sometimes you find yourself in that tiny percentage, despite being careful, and having the option to terminate should always be there.
111. The Husband said:
I am not a fan of abortion. The thing is I don't think anyone else is either. I think that everyone's goal is for there to be fewer abortions instead of more. The difference is how you go about reaching that goal. Do you outlaw and criminalize it or do you educate and encourage the use of contraceptives?
112. megan said:
i think the term "anti-choice" should be used with more regularity. it is much more accurately descriptive of the associated sentiments than the outdated "pro-life."
113. Molly said:
#33, jill - I am banging my head against my desk right now.
#37, almostvegetarian - Right? The fact that the thought even crossed her mind terrifies me more than just about any issue, including people talking about what should or should not be going on in my uterus.
114. robin said:
Heather, I am so grateful that you are writing about politics, although I know you can't influence everyone, you can present the facts. McCain and Palin scare me, they really do. She is a complete narcissist. To be one heartbeat away from the presidency after being a mayor of a small town and governor of Alaska is beyond frightening. It's true that Obama hasn't been tested, but he is extremely brilliant, his leadership skills are superb and he has the best minds in the country supporting him. And he inspires young people - which is great.
McCain's tax plans will send this country further into the toilet. How could anyone in their right mind who is not a member of the top five percent in this country even consider voting for them?
And abortion? That was decided forty years ago. Leave it alone. Women - do we really want the government telling us what we can and cannot do when it comes to bringing a life into this world. I have a twenty year-old daughter and raising her has been the toughest job I've ever done
As a former writer of "Guiding Light" - which I guess you used to watch - I am thrilled that we women have the chance to really affect the outcome of this election and throw the Republicans out of the White House and Congress. Thanks for taking a leadership role in the discussion.
115. Anonymous said:
Heather, honestly, Obama with his support of a bill that does not allow babies born alive in abortions the right to medical access scares me MUCH, MUCH more than McCain. See link below on Obama's stances on abortion. Also, if Leta (God forbid) ends up pregnant at 15, do you think she should be allowed to have an abortion without telling you? When she's still required to have you sign field trip permission slips, should any child be allowed to undergo an invasive surgery without notifying her parents?
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.14_George_Robert_Obama's%20Abortion%20Extremism_.xml
The questions about the political stances of presidential candidates about abortion go both ways, IMHO.
116. agree to disagree.... said:
Abortion really isn't a religious issue, it is a legal issue...taking a life is taking a life...murder isn't a religious issue...I am a pretty liberal feminist...but this issue doesn't belong in that context
117. Sarah said:
Both Alexa and Julie wrote so, so, SO eloquently on this issue, from their own experiences which, yes, are outside the norm but also in some ways put you SO MUCH CLOSER to the issue.
As the parent of an extremely premature child myself, I can say that having birthed a child on the "cusp of viability" (in my case, 25-and-change weeks - a bit past the true cusp, but still way, way, WAY too early) having that experience muddies your opinion on the abortion issue so, so much. There is a clinic that performs abortions not too far from our house, and there are always one or two protesters out there. I drove by there this week and, I kid you not, one of their posters could have been a picture of my child on the day she was born. It was like a punch in the gut.
Many people come out of an experience like mine, or like Alexa's, adamantly pro-life. (I avoid the abortion issue like the plague at March of Dimes functions, lemmetellya.) Many others, myself included, come out of it still strongly pro-choice but also very conflicted. In some places it would still have been legal to terminate my pregnancy. Was my child viable? I don't know, I supposed it depends on how you define "viability". Is a child who requires surfactant and mechanical ventilation to survive "viable"? What if the child is going to have zero quality of life? (I'm thinking things like Tay Sachs here.) And, as Alexa and others have addressed much more eloquently than I will ever be able to, at what point do you make the decision that the mother's life is in too much jeopardy? And yet, my possibly-legal-to-terminate kid is now an obnoxiously precocious, charming, beautiful four year old. How do I square THAT with being pro-choice?
It makes me almost blindingly angry to think that I once uttered the words, "I'd consider voting for John McCain." A lot has changed in the last eight years, that's for sure, and it's not just about the war in Iraq.
118. CTM said:
I agree that abortion is a sticky subject and that in reality, it should be someone's choice to live with what can reasonably construed as murder.
However, none of this makes me reconsider voting for McCain. Abortion is always a "non-issue" that is construed to be so very important. Honestly, it's the last thing on my mind this election.
119. Husband Clothes said:
Um, voting for McCain is one thing. Voting for Palin--whole new ballpark, baby!
Just sent my ballot. I'm going to be like Joe the plumber and pretend to be secretive about my vote. Also, like him, I will continue to not have a plumbing license.
hahahahahhahh
120. Michelle - Tx said:
I am a yellow dog democrat living in Tx, xCatholic, xMormon, Chritian and married - I am not a fan of bush or what has happened in the last 8 yrs. I am also a women who can not get/stay pregnant. I have tried to adopt special needs chidren (siblings) through tx child protective services and terminated the adoption (a whole other topic of discussion). The issue of abortion is much bigger then abortion. If the government can control what I as a women does w/my body - its a short jump for the govt controlling all our bodies - including our children. Keep in mind how we vote today effects us years from now and sets precendences that can be fought in the courts. Who is to say if they overturn roe v. wade that in 10 yrs they (govt) wont mandate we all give up a kidney whether we like it or not - or force people to have children and give them away. God bless us all... and god help us if mccain/palin win the election. I will be one of the hundreds/thousands heading north toward canada.
121. BigSkyMum said:
Amen, Nelson.
122. Erin said:
To anyone who doubts the president will have any impact on abortion policy in the U.S., let me remind you that the next president will most likely appoint one or two new justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. This could most definitely affect the outcome of an abortion case, including the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade.
123. Anonymous said:
I have been reading through the comments and seeing decisions based in fear. We are all forgetting that health care reform and abortion rights have been hashed back and forth for years now. I don't think in my lifetime that Roe v. Wade will ever be overturned. And as for the platform planks on healthcare... they are just that... planks, and don't mean that they will come into law just by our mere votes. They still have to go before the congress... and we need to be digigent with our elected officials and letting them know how we want them to vote in our interests. The older I get, the more I see that I needed to be more diligent in my younger years. I am a republican, but I don't vote party lines... I vote with as much education and information that I can glean from both sides. It's been a rough few weeks for me to sleep as I seek to find information that will guide me in making an informed choice when I do vote. I am a 2 time cancer survivor and also a woman who lost her uterus because of poor military medicine while trying to conceive. I have a lot to lose with both sides... but I know that I have to stay on task with my elected officials too.
124. McCain't said:
Government has no place in the issue of abortion- unless it is to regulate the sanitary conditions of the facilities or the necessary qualifications of the doctors. McCain is confused, dilusional, and frankly needs to bow down……Men have no concept of the emotional and physical trauma of abortion- the issue needs to be mute when it comes to presidentail debates and governmental discussions.
125. Tanya said:
102. Pixelfish said: while McCain and Palin talk about equal pay for women, McCain couldn't be bothered to vote on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
---
Obama pays his female staff 83 cents compared to each dollar the men make. McCain pays women $1.04 to the men's dollar. (Source)
Which one just talks about equal pay, and which one actually pays women more?
126. Melinda said:
But what about small business owners? I think YOU might be considered a small business owner with your little online empire here...or the REAL small business owners with overhead and employees and the like. Abortion and war aside, we have all learned in recent weeks that it's the economy that makes the country run, so by voting for your liberal values alone will KILL this country when small businesses begin closing left and right due to their struggle with obama's tax increases.
it's easy to become utopian in an election year and forget the REALITY of how the world works...
Just a thought...
127. Cari O. said:
Amen, Amen, Amen.
I'll be interested in John McCain's opinion on abortion when he can have one.
128. michelle said:
I am glad to have stumbled upon this post today. Somehow, I missed the AIR QUOTES when I watched the debate yesterday on my DVR while running around after my two kids.
What I'd heard was McCain throwing around the term "pro- abortion" which as I've felt for a long time is the ignorant umbrella that pro-lifers hold over pro-choicers. No one, let me reapeat, NO ONE is pro- abortion. Those of us who believe in Choice want women to have access to safe and legal procedures. Period.
Before this debate, I was